RE: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Glen,
 
Please add Milton and Avri to the Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: Mary Wong [mailto:MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:19 PM
        To: William Drake; Gomes, Chuck
        Cc: GNSO Council List; Glen@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter 
Drafting Team
        
        
        Thanks to Liz and Chuck for their clarifications and suggestions.
         
        I agree that the DT should be reasonably small, and would in this case 
personally prefer not to set numbers for each SG/SO/AC, or worry about 
matching/equivalence. In other situations and over other issues, equal 
representation of each group may be a fundamental concern, but in this case I 
believe NCSG is recommending Avri and Milton not because we believe we (or 
everyone) needs at least two (or however many) representatives. Rather, and for 
the reasons that Bill has stated, Avri and Milton will best represent NCSG in 
terms of what is likely to be a difficult preliminary issue (i.e. scoping out 
the WG). 
         
        Cheers
        Mary
         
         
         
        Mary W S Wong
        Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
        Franklin Pierce Law Center
        Two White Street
        Concord, NH 03301
        USA
        Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Phone: 1-603-513-5143
        Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
        Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network 
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584


        >>> 
From:   "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>    
To:      "William Drake" <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   
CC:      Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>       
Date:   2/1/2010 4:33 PM        
Subject:        RE: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter 
Drafting Team      
I wouldn't see any problem with that.  I just think it would be best to keep it 
as small as reasonably possible because of the short timeframe and limited 
task.  If the CSG wants three to cover three constituencies, would you want 
three?  (BTW, they have not asked for three.)
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:28 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck
        Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
        Subject: Re: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter 
Drafting Team
        
        
        Chuck, 

        Two.  There are some fundamental issues in the air about the proper 
scope and terms of reference for the WG that need to be sorted out by the DT.  
Even if NCSG were to resolve its internal differences on these points, there 
would probably still be differences between the houses once the discussion gets 
to specifics. We're dealing with a rather variable geometry of perspectives, 
and as I say both people mentioned will add to working these things through.

        Best,

        Bill
        

        On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:09 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:


                Bill,
                 
                How many do you think the NCSG needs for the charter drafting 
team, not for the WG.
                 
                Chuck


________________________________

                        From: William Drake 
[mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                        Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:59 PM
                        To: Gomes, Chuck
                        Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
                        Subject: Re: [council] Volunteer for Vertical 
Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team
                        
                        
                        Hi 

                        And from NCSG, Avri Doria and Milton Mueller.  

                        One participant from each SG would not work for NCSG, 
as we have a couple of contending perspectives in play, with multiple members 
aligned with each.  Avri and Milton have been very active and thoughtful 
proponents of those respective perspectives, both of which overlap/synergize in 
some ways with the positions advanced by other SGs.  Should be an interesting 
discussion...

                        Best,

                        Bill


                        On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:


                                Glen,
                                 
                                Please add Brian Cute from Afilias to this DT.
                                 
                                Thanks, Chuck
                                 



        ***********************************************************
        William J. Drake
        Senior Associate
        Centre for International Governance
        Graduate Institute of International and
         Development Studies
        Geneva, Switzerland
        william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
        ***********************************************************