ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] RE: Ooops....[Re: Draft Council letter on the ARR]

  • To: "William Drake" <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] RE: Ooops....[Re: Draft Council letter on the ARR]
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:32:57 -0700
  • Cc: "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.2.05

Bill,

What I meant was that no objections were raised during the full Council
discussion and vote. 

Tim 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] RE: Ooops....[Re: Draft Council letter on the
ARR]
From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, January 29, 2010 11:44 am
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Tim,
On Jan 29, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:

 There were no questions or objections raised regarding that
sentence so I believe it was assumed to be part of the letter. 




On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:

I disagree with the characterization and it will likely be an issue
among other Non-contracted party councilors.  Nonetheless, I agree that
the letter should go to Council for review, and we can tinker with it
later.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>