RE: FW: [council] FW: Draft Motions on Vertical Integration

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,
 
First of all, it seems to me that the following 'whereas' clause is a
resolution and covered in that part of the motion, so I think it could
be deleted:  "Whereas, notwithstanding the recommendations in the Issues
Report, the GNSO Council has decided to initiate a PDP on vertical
integration between registries and registrars; and"
 
Debbie - As the seconder of the motion, do you consider it a friendly
amendment?
 
Do any Councilors need more time to vet this amendment with their SGs
and/or Constituencies?
 
Chuck
 
 


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
        Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:32 AM
        To: GNSO Council
        Subject: FW: FW: [council] FW: Draft Motions on Vertical
Integration
        
        

        All,

         

        Attached please find a somewhat redrafted motion in support of a
PDP, which I accept in its entirety as a friendly amendment to my
pending motion. 

         

        Thanks,

        Mike

         

        Mike Rodenbaugh

        RODENBAUGH LAW

        tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

        http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/>