Re: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes

Le 27 janv. 2010 à 21:58, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :

> 
> I would accept this as a friendly amendment.  Stephan, as the seconder of the 
> motion, would you also accept it as friendly?
> 
> Glen - please add this amendment to the motion.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:36 PM
>> To: Gomes, Chuck; william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
>> 
>> On behalf of the ISPCP constituency I'd like to suggest the 
>> following edit regarding "Support Teams" (ST).
>> The draft amendment attached is targeted to provide more 
>> flexibility to the Review Teams in order to let themselves 
>> organize their support teams rather than to constitute 
>> support teams in advance. 
>> 
>> Looking forward to a fruitful discussion Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 23:35
>> An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
>> Betreff: RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
>> 
>> Thanks Wolf.  If you could propose a suggested edit, it would 
>> be very helpful.
>> 
>> Chuck 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
>> KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:36 PM
>>> To: william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Following a consultation within the ISPCP constituency I'd like to 
>>> address the creation of "Support Teams" (ST). There must be a clear 
>>> distinction between the RTs and potential STs in order to avoid STs 
>>> emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the composition of the ST pools has 
>>> carefully to be taken into consideration or should even be 
>> regulated.  
>>> If applicable this should be expressed in the council response.
>>> 
>>> Apart from that the ISPCP constituency endorses the draft response.
>>> 
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von William Drake
>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 16:40
>>> An: GNSO Council List
>>> Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to the 
>>> draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements and 
>>> Implementation Processes, for discussion with our 
>> respective SGs and 
>>> in the Council.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Bill
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>