ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] New AOB agenda item for 7 Jan

  • To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] New AOB agenda item for 7 Jan
  • From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:47:28 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <AB85164D-DB41-4B7C-890A-7E3C164C1FE7@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcqNWzZcnYyDqncPSb6AyOXfe2jLWgAAeAGw
  • Thread-topic: [council] New AOB agenda item for 7 Jan

Happy New Year, all!
 
I have no objection to adding this agenda item as a late agenda item.  I 
suspect that there are probably some extreme circumstances under which I would 
object to adding a late agenda item, but none comes immediately to mind.  
 
On a broader note, if we established a rule against adding late agenda items, 
what would we consider acceptable as an AOB item?
 
K
 
________________________________

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 11:28 AM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: Fwd: [council] New AOB agenda item for 7 Jan 



        Just a thought, not on the topic itself but on the issue of adding 
agenda items after the cut-off date. I've discussed this privately with Olga 
and Chuck and we all wonder if there is anyone on the Council that is 
uncomfortable with including late agenda items such as this one? Although 
everytime we've done this I've personally felt it was fully justified, I wonder 
if everyone is OK with this? 

        Thanks,

        Stéphane
        


        Début du message réexpédié :


                De : "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
                
                Date : 3 janvier 2010 18:43:05 HNEC
                
                À : "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                
                Objet : [council] New AOB agenda item for 7 Jan 
                

                I just received a message from Janis Karklins regarding the 
joint GAC/GNSO meeting in Nairobi confirming the 5-6 pm slot on Sunday. He also 
proposed the following two topics for discussion:
                 
                1. New gTLD policy implementation, including EoI
                2. AoC
                 
                I know that we are already past our deadline for agenda 
finalization, but I believe that would should initiate discussion on this on 7 
Jan.  There will be no action other than discussion regarding the following: 1) 
how we feel about the two proposed topics; 2) whether we have any other topics 
we want to suggest; 3) how should we proceed in preparing for the session with 
the GAC.  
                 
                Glen - Please add the following to the 7 Jan agenda under AOB:
                 
                7.3 Joint Meeting with the GAC in Nairobi
                 
                7.3.1 Discussion re. GAC proposed topics: 1) New gTLD policy 
implementation, including EoI; 2) AoC.
                 
                7.3.2 Other possible topics to propose to the GAC?
                 
                7.3.3 Discussion re. how we should prepare for the joint 
GAC/GNSO session.
                 
                Thanks, Chuck




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>