Re: [council] Amended Motion to Approve the Alternative Proposal recommended by the Special Trademark Issues Review Team
Chuck, I will make this motion and request Council exception so that it can be considered in today's meeting. Thanks, Stéphane Le 16 déc. 2009 à 23:11, Gomes, Chuck a écrit : > After discussion with several people, in anticipation of possible action in > our Council meeting tomorrow, I made some changes to the previously > distributed and posted draft motion regarding the Alternative Proposal > recommended by the Special Trademark Issues Review Team. To make it easy to > see the changes I made, I attached a redline version. I also copied the > amended motion below. > > Note that we still need someone to make this motion or another one and then > someone to second it. Because the motion has not been formally made, there > does not appear to be a need to ask whether my proposed amendments are > friendly. Clearly, anyone who makes a motion may rewrite it however they > like. The purpose of providing a draft motion was to facilitate the process. > > Glen - please post the amended motion in front of the original motion. > > Chuck > > > > Motion to Approve the Alternative Proposal recommended by the Special > Trademark Issues Review Team (Amended 16 Dec 09) > Whereas, on 12 October 2009, the ICANN Board sent a letter > (http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/beckstrom-to-gnso-council-12oct09-en.pdf > ) to the GNSO requesting its review of the policy implications of certain > trademark protection mechanisms proposed for the New gTLD Program; > > Whereas, in response to the Board’s letter, on 28 October 2009 the GNSO > created the Special Trademarks Issues (STI) review team to analyze the > specific rights protection mechanisms that have been proposed for inclusion > into the Draft Applicant Guidebook; > > Whereas, on 11 December 2009, the STI Review Team delivered its Report (link: > http://gnso.icann.org/issues/) to the GNSO Council describing an alternative > proposal to address trademark concerns in the New gTLD Program that was > supported by a consensus of its members; > > Whereas, the GNSO has reviewed the STI Report, and the minority reports > included therein, and desires to approve the alternative proposal recommended > by the STI review team; > > NOW THEREFORE, BE IT: > > RESOLVED, that the GNSO appreciates the hard work and tremendous effort shown > by each member of the STI review team in developing the STI alternative > proposal on an expedited basis; > > RESOLVED, that the GNSO hereby approves the overall package of > recommendations contained in the STI Report, and resolves that the STI > proposal to create a Trademark Clearinghouse and a Uniform Rapid Suspension > procedure as described in the STI Report is a more effective and > implementable solution than the Staff proposal described in the Draft > Applicant Guidebook Version 3 and its accompanying memoranda; > > RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to forward the > recommendations to the Board in response to its 12 October 2009 letter > (http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/beckstrom-to-gnso-council-12oct09-en.pdf) > and acknowledges that the STI report will be posted as soon as possible for > a forty-five (45) day public comment period to allow the ICANN community to > comment on the STI recommendations prior to finalization of the model to be > included in the Draft Applicant Guidebook. > > > > > > > <Motion regarding STI Review Team Recommendations - amended 16 Dec 09.doc> Attachment:
smime.p7s
|