Re: [council] Motions for 17 Dec Council Meeting
Thanks Chuck, I don't understand why that requirement applies to motion 3, which you made on Dec 4, therefore well inside the 8-day requirement by my count. On motion 2, I am in the same boat as you (overwhelmed by emails) and cannot find the original motion proposal (which I take it was made by staff, since it is not even moved yet). Do you have a record of what date that was? Thanks, Stéphane Le 14 déc. 2009 à 15:02, Gomes, Chuck a écrit : > Thanks for the correction Stephane. Not sure how I missed your second of > motion 3. > > Regarding the Council Operating Procedures requirement that motions should be > submitted 8 days prior to a Council meeting, that requirement would apply to > motion 2, motion 3 and motion 4. In all three cases the Coucil would need to > agree to an exception to the procedures requirement or we will have to delay > action on all three topics. > > Chuck > > From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:43 AM > To: Gomes, Chuck > Cc: GNSO Council > Subject: Re: [council] Motions for 17 Dec Council Meeting > > Hi Chuck, > > Your description is incorrect. I had seconded motion 3 on December 6. > > Further, it is my assessment of the 8 day notice requirement set out by > article 3.3 of the GNSO operating rules and procedures that motion 4, > proposed by Wolf on Dec 13, cannot be submitted for our Dec 17 meeting. > > I am happy to be corrected if this assessment is wrong. > > Thanks, > > Stéphane > > Le 13 déc. 2009 à 14:22, Gomes, Chuck a écrit : > >> For our 17 Dec Council meeting, the following four motions listed below with >> their status are posted at >> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?17_december_motions): >> Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO >> Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups (amended 4 Dec 09) - moved & seconded >> Motion to Approve the Alternative Proposal recommended by the Special >> Trademark Issues Review Team - needs to be moved and seconded >> Motion to delay decision regarding initiation of a Vertical Integration PDP >> - needs to be seconded >> Proposed Motion on Support for a PDP Work Team Face to Face Meeting - needs >> to be seconded >> At this point, only motion 1 above is ready for action. So we need someone >> to make motion 2 and, if that happens, we will need a second. We also need >> seconds on motions 3 & 4. >> >> Chuck > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|