<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: AW: [council] Amended Motion To Approve OSC Tool Kit of Services Recommendations
- To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx, owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: AW: [council] Amended Motion To Approve OSC Tool Kit of Services Recommendations
- From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:19:12 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-rim-org-msg-ref-id :message-id:reply-to:x-priority:references:in-reply-to:sensitivity :importance:to:subject:from:date:content-type:mime-version; bh=zGr/6+l00kVC7sUs55JAWupygY5Q+huSxq3Ac++G4Sc=; b=cJ23oqAcUDtp8+C3IHK5+3QaKkDy3VDsWc/b1o7TZbGXIYqjffNW3CRHosHVG714CL FMwas0tA7k3GDvtYfOuELpoDGbn1QV8k061tTm8MZcoPurrtEK/v3PKzxZXddZ0juzef vnaVcnaApzxLGxlYIJYCBdc1XpDEWEiZX8pSY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-rim-org-msg-ref-id:message-id:reply-to:x-priority:references :in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance:to:subject:from:date :content-type:mime-version; b=TKUon69bx+fuhtg3BnpiwekwTe3aK896YiBm8XRfkZOKxx884LcTzwZ4SbzVd5VCuX 95SThKt7C4V93GW6QpfHPXy7pT00DMAqq/T1Yh2UoMMbIQ1Qz810nFR63B6Qw7NDQbIJ fzmWW9rwyUkO7EPrJl0GsezhjadqC6snFj390=
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEEB2FA7F@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702FB42AB@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com><592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEEB2FA7F@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de>
- Reply-to: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
Chuck, I consider it a friendly ammendment. I second the motion.
Olga
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de movistar Profesional
(http://www.movistarempresas.com.ar)
-----Original Message-----
From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:57:24
To: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: AW: [council] Amended Motion To Approve OSC Tool Kit of Services
Recommendations
Well done, Chuck. I will second the motion.
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 21:56
An: GNSO Council
Betreff: [council] Amended Motion To Approve OSC Tool Kit of Services
Recommendations
In response to Tim's proposed amendments to the Motion To Approve OSC
Tool Kit of Services Recommendations, I considered his amendments
friendly and hence revised the motion as attached and copied below.
Note that the changes are highlighted in the attached document to make
it easy to see the amendments.
Olga and Wolf, as seconders to the motion, do you also consider the
amendments friendly?
Glen - please post the amended motion.
Chuck
Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO
Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups (amended 4 Dec 09)
Motion by: Chuck Gomes
Seconded by:
Whereas the Board Governance Committee Report on GNSO Improvements (BGC
Report) tasked ICANN staff with developing, within six months, in
consultation with the GNSO Council, a "tool kit" of basic services that
would be made available to all constituencies. (See Report of the Board
Governance Committee GNSO Review Working Group on GNSO Improvements, 3
February 2008 located at
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-repor
t-03feb08.pdf, p. 46.);
Whereas the ICANN Board approved the BGC GNSO Improvement
Recommendations on 26 June 2008
(http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc76113182);
Whereas in January 2009 the GNSO Council formed the Operations Steering
Committee (OSC) to develop recommendations to implement operational
changes contained in the BGC Report;
Whereas the OSC established three Work Teams, including the GNSO
Stakeholder Group and Constituency Operations Work Team, to take on the
work of each of the three operational areas addressed in the BGC Report
recommendations;
Whereas the GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Operations Work Team
developed and approved Tool Kit Services Recommendations for GNSO
Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups on 25 October 2009 and sent them
to the OSC for review;
Whereas the OSC accepted the Work Team's recommendations;
Whereas on 5 Nov 09 the document was distributed to the Council list and
Councilors were asked to forward the recommendations to their respective
groups for review and comment ASAP with the tentative goal of Council
action in our December meeting;
Whereas the implementation of the toolkit has process and budgetary
implications;
RESOLVED, the Council approves the recommendations
(http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendations-for-gnso
-05nov09-en.pdf
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendations-for-gnso
-05nov09-en.pdf> ) and directs Staff to: 1) share the recommendations
with the Board; 2) post the document on the GNSO web page at
http://gnso.icann.org/ <http://gnso.icann.org/> ; 3) estimate the cost
of the services; 4) estimate what funds might be available; 5)
prioritize the list of services in cooperation with the Council; 6)
develop specifications for providing the services, including
requirements for their use and procedures for requesting them; and 7)
notify applicable GNSO organizations of the services, specifications and
procedures for requesting them.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|