RE: [council] Proposed Amended Motion To Approve OSC Tool Kit of Services Recommendations

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Tim.  I definitely consider the intent of your changes friendly.
Once I found out that the recommendations do not require Board approval,
I was planning on editing the resolution anyway to task Staff with
working on implementation. What you have done essentially accomplishes
that.  I would probably make one minor modification because I think the
prioritization should probably not be none by Staff along but rather in
cooperation with the Council.  I will redraft the motion to incorporate
your suggestions and mine and send it back to you for comment.

Chuck  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 10:04 AM
> To: GNSO Council 
> Subject: [council] Proposed Amended Motion To Approve OSC 
> Tool Kit of Services Recommendations
> 
> 
> Chuck,
> 
> I'd to like propose a friendly amendment to your motion. I've 
> incorporated it into the full motion below. The amendment 
> involves adding the last Whereas and replacing the RESOLVED 
> paragraph with the one included below. It incorporates the 
> steps Liz noted, making it clear that the 
> requirements/specifications of requesting support are yet to 
> be determined.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> =======================
> Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for 
> GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups
> 
> Motion by: Chuck Gomes
> Seconded by: 
> 
> Whereas the Board Governance Committee Report on GNSO 
> Improvements (BGC
> Report) tasked ICANN staff with developing, within six 
> months, in consultation with the GNSO Council, a "tool kit" 
> of basic services that would be made available to all 
> constituencies. (See Report of the Board Governance Committee 
> GNSO Review Working Group on GNSO Improvements, 3 February 
> 2008 located at 
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvem
> ents-report-03feb08.pdf,
> p. 46.);
> 
> Whereas the ICANN Board approved the BGC GNSO Improvement 
> Recommendations on 26 June 2008 
> (http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc7
> 6113182);
> 
> Whereas in January 2009 the GNSO Council formed the 
> Operations Steering Committee (OSC) to develop 
> recommendations to implement operational changes contained in 
> the BGC Report;
> 
> Whereas the OSC established three Work Teams, including the 
> GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Operations Work Team, 
> to take on the work of each of the three operational areas 
> addressed in the BGC Report recommendations; 
> 
> Whereas the GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency 
> Operations Work Team developed and approved Tool Kit Services 
> Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder 
> Groups on 25 October 2009 and sent them to the OSC for review;
> 
> Whereas the OSC accepted the Work Team's recommendations; 
> 
> Whereas on 5 Nov 09 the document was distributed to the 
> Council list and Councilors were asked to forward the 
> recommendations to their respective groups for review and 
> comment ASAP with the tentative goal of Council action in our 
> December meeting;
> 
> Whereas the implementation of the toolkit has process and 
> budgetary implications;
> 
> RESOLVED, the Council approves the recommendations
> (http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendation
> s-for-gnso-05nov09-en.pdf)
> and directs Staff to 1. Share the recommendations with the 
> Board and post the document on the GNSO web page at 
> http://gnso.icann.org/; 2.
> Determine the cost of the services; 3. Determine what funds 
> might be available; 4. Prioritize the list of services; 5. 
> Develop specifications for providing the services, including 
> requirements for their use and procedures for requesting 
> them; and 6. Notify the GNSO organizations of the services 
> and specifications.
> =======================
> 
> 
>