Re: AW: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups
As written, I would think that the RrSG would find it difficult to support TK recommendations considering that the second one is requesting: Support for organizing face-to-face meetings (e.g. date/time, location, equipment, telephone bridge and, in certain venues, arranging accommodations) I know the email I sent to the Council list a few days ago raising the issue of a tendency towards more and more requests for F2F meetings for WTs and DTs has not generated much discussion. I do hope this is simply because people have other things on their plate and not that the issue is of no interest to anyone. Perhaps this motion, and the contents of the TK recommendations, will generate some discussion on the matter... Thanks, Stéphane Le 3 déc. 2009 à 09:52, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > Chuck, > > I'd like to second this motion but have one question regarding to the > "resolved": does "sharing the recommendations with the board.." mean that > there is no further need for board approval? In this case the council might > direct staff to execute the recommendations. > > Best regards > Wolf-Ulrich > > > > Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im > Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 06:33 > An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for > GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups > > I am making this motion for action in our 17 Dec 09 Council meeting. > > Glen - Please post this per normal practice. Thanks. > > Chuck > > Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO > Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups > > Motion by: Chuck Gomes > Seconded by: > > Whereas the Board Governance Committee Report on GNSO Improvements (BGC > Report) tasked ICANN staff with developing, within six months, in > consultation with the GNSO Council, a “tool kit” of basic services that would > be made available to all constituencies. (See Report of the Board Governance > Committee GNSO Review Working Group on GNSO Improvements, 3 February 2008 > located at > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-report-03feb08.pdf, > p. 46.); > > Whereas the ICANN Board approved the BGC GNSO Improvement Recommendations on > 26 June 2008 > (http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc76113182); > > Whereas in January 2009 the GNSO Council formed the Operations Steering > Committee (OSC) to develop recommendations to implement operational changes > contained in the BGC Report; > > Whereas the OSC established three Work Teams, including the GNSO Stakeholder > Group and Constituency Operations Work Team, to take on the work of each of > the three operational areas addressed in the BGC Report recommendations; > > Whereas the GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Operations Work Team > developed and approved Tool Kit Services Recommendations for GNSO > Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups on 25 October 2009 and sent them to the > OSC for review; > > Whereas the OSC accepted the Work Team's recommendations; > > Whereas on 5 Nov 09 the document was distributed to the Council list and > Councilors were asked to forward the recommendations to their respective > groups for review and comment ASAP with the tentative goal of Council action > in our December meeting; > > RESOLVED, the Council accepts the recommendations > (http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendations-for-gnso-05nov09-en.pdf) > and directs Staff to share the recommendations with the Board and post the > document on the GNSO web page at http://gnso.icann.org/. > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|