<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Revised Agenda with updates in preparation for GNSO Council meeting, Monday, 23 November at 11:00 UTC
My apologies, I mis-converted the timezones for this meeting and had it
in my calendar wrong. I will catch up with the reports.
--Wendy
Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> In preparation for the GNSO Council meeting on Monday, 23 November 2009 at
> 11:00 UTC.
> The agenda with the corresponding times is posted at:
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-23nov09-en.htm
>
> Please find a copy of the agenda on the Wiki with the status updates added.
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_23_november_2009
> In particular:
> -- Please review the JIG charter for approval
> 8.5. JIG (Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Group Edmon
>
> The draft Charter documents, clean and redline version, have been posted
> under draft documents and can be accessed at:
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/jig-charter-redline-30oct09.pdf
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/jig-charter-clean-30oct09.pdf
>
>
> --Please review the updated Action Item list at:
> http://gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/meetings/pending-action-list.pdf
>
> --Please review the motions
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?23_november_motions
>
>
> This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating
> Procedures approved 28 October 2009 for the GNSO Council
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/operating-procedures-revised-draft-clean-09oct09-en.pdf
> Coordinated Universal Time:11:00 UTC - see below for local times
>
> (03:00 Los Angeles, 06:00 Washington DC, 11:00 London, 12:00 Brussels, 22:00
> Melbourne )
>
> Chair: Chuck Gomes; Vice Chairs: Olga Cavalli & Stéphane Van Gelder
>
> Note: This meeting will be recorded.
>
> Scheduled time for meeting 120 mins.
>
> Dial-in numbers sent individually to Council members.
>
> Item 1: Administrative matters
>
> 1.1. Roll call of Council members
>
> 1.2. Welcome new member(s)
>
> 1.3. Update any statements of interest
>
> Caroline Greer - Statement of interest
> http://gnso.icann.org/council/soi/greer-soi-13nov09-en.htm
>
> 1.4. Review/amend agenda
>
> Item 2: Review of changes and action items in the new Operating Procedures
>
> 2.1. Section 3.3 Notice of Meetings - note that:
> -----2.1.1. "Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for
> inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than 8 business
> days before the GNSO Council meeting."
>
> 2.2. Section 3.4 Meeting Schedules
>
> -----2.2.1. "The GNSO Chair and GNSO Council will prepare a 12-month schedule
> of meetings within 30 days following the ICANN annual meeting."
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/proposed-gnso-council-meetings-dates-2009-2010-23nov09-en.pdf
>
> -----2.2.2. Deadline = 30 Nov 09.
>
> -----2.2.3. Draft 12-month schedule proposed by chair and vice chairs
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/proposed-gnso-council-meetings-dates-2009-2010-23nov09-en.pdf
>
> -----2.2.4. Next steps?
>
> 2.3. Section 3.5 Procedure to Produce the Minutes
>
> -----2.3.1. "Within 10 days of the meeting, the Chair and Vice Chairs will
> edit the draft and request the Secretariat to circulate the draft summary to
> GNSO Council members for comment and approval. All comments received will be
> accepted for inclusion into the draft minutes unless there are objections. If
> no objections are received within 10 days, the minutes will be deemed to have
> been approved for posting."
> -----2.3.2. Note that we no longer will need to approve minutes in our live
> meeting but each Councilor will individually be responsible for reviewing and
> commenting on the minutes.
>
> Item 3: Motion to approve minor edits to Council Operating Procedures
>
> Council Operating Procedures - clean version
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/gnso-operating-procedures-clean-12nov09-en.pdf
>
> Council operating procedures - redline version
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/gnso-operating-procedures-redline-12nov09-en.pdf
>
> (As requested, the above have been posted on page
> http://gnso.icann.org/)
>
> See motion: 23 november motions
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?23_november_motions
>
> Item 4: Council meeting times through March 2010
>
> 4.1. Thanks to Stéphane, Adrian, Edmon & Han Chuan for their work.
>
> 4.2. Meeting Times Chart
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/time-options-council-meetings-02-04nov09-en.pdf
>
> 4.3. Discussion Stéphane
>
> 4.4. Proposed meeting dates through February: 23 November; 17 December 2009;
> 7 January; 28 January 2010; 18 February 2010
>
> 4.5. Next steps
>
> 4.6. Date and time for next meeting?
>
> Item 5: 12-month meeting schedule (see 2.2.1 above)
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/proposed-gnso-council-meetings-dates-2009-2010-23nov09-en.pdf
>
> Item 6: Special Trademark Issues (STI) Review Team
>
> 6.1. Special Trademark Issues update - Zahid Jamil (pending review by STI
> chair)
>
> When this update was written the STI had held four conference calls. Two each
> on each of the two heads (TM Clearinghouse & URS) raised by the Board's
> letter.
> Constituencies represented and ALAC have provided their position statements
> in regards the issues and the Group is currently working on a Common Grounds
> Paper where some issues have reached agreement. This update will avoid
> identifying/characterising issues under discussion or their importance since
> there may be varying views on these.
> There is some interest for a possible face to face meeting to attempt
> resolution of outstanding issues or at least to meet once comments are
> received on the final report of the STI.
> It has been felt by the STI that the time allocated for submission of the
> Final Report is not practically feasible if consensus on all issues is to be
> effectively reached.
> Whereas the GNSO had passed a resolution in its Public meeting at Seoul on
> 28th October 2009 stating that "The GNSO STI review team will provide a final
> report to the GNSO on or before the GNSO's council meeting in late November,
> 2009". There is consensus within the STI Review Team that the time available
> for submission of a final report may not be adequate in order for the Review
> Team to submit meaningful and efficacious report. The Review Team suggests
> that the next meeting of the GNSO be scheduled near enough the deadline (14th
> of December 2009) set by the Board for submission of the GNSO response, in
> order to provide the Review Team with adequate time to effectively complete
> its review and submit a final report before the date of the next GNSO meeting
> to be scheduled before the Board mandated deadline. However, the STI-RT
> intends to deliver its report no later than Monday, 7 December."
>
> 6.2. Next steps
>
> ------6.2.1. SG review
> ------6.2.2. Finalization of document
> ------6.2.3. Delivery to the Board (due 14 December 2009)
>
> Item 7: Prioritization of GNSO work
>
> 7.1. Status Report Olga
>
> 7.2. Next steps?
>
> Item 8: Status updates
>
> 8.1. Issues report on vertical separation of Registries & Registrars Margie
>
> 8.2. GNSO Improvements WT recommendations ready for Council review Chuck
>
> ----8.2.1. OSC Constituency work team recommendations for a constituency /SG
> toolkit of services
> (for discussion only)
>
> 8.3. Joint SSAC/GNSO WG on Internationalized Data Registration Liz/Julie
>
> 8.4. Board update Denise
>
> 8.5. JIG (Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Group Edmon
>
> The draft Charter documents, clean and redline version, have been posted
> under draft documents and can be accessed at:
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/jig-charter-redline-30oct09.pdf
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/jig-charter-clean-30oct09.pdf
>
>
> 8.6. Other
>
> 8.7. Questions/comments on written status updates sent in advance by chairs
> of Working Groups, Work Teams, etc.?
>
> Registration Abuse Policies Working Group - Mike Rodenbaugh
> The Registration Abuse Policies Working Group continues its work, and has
> agreed on a schedule to produce an Initial Report in advance of the Nairobi
> meeting. If anyone has any questions, please advise on the list. I will not
> attend the Council call on Nov. 23 (at 3a.m.!).
> Geo Regions Working Group - Olga Cavalli
> The working group is preparing a survey of percieved community value/benefits
> of ICANN Geographic regions framework.
> Draft Interim Report is being reviewed by working group members, these
> comments will be used to prepare a new version of the report.
> Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) Sub-team A (Registrant Rights
> Charter) - Beau Brendler coordinator
> Subteam A met concurrently with subteam B in Seoul, during which time we
> discussed the parameters of the task and reviewed some similar, but not
> necessarily analogous, efforts by other groups (one consumer and one
> industry) to create sets of best practices, guidelines and consumer "bills of
> rights." There was some consensus that the final product would need to be
> readable and understandable by the consumer and not overloaded with legal
> jargon.
> Subteam A will be having its first conference call next week, either Monday
> or Tuesday, during which time we will briefly discuss, among other topics,
> the recent suggestions of the law enforcement community and the RAA, as well
> as beginning to go line-by-line through the existing charter document.
> Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) subteam B (identifying issues for
> possible RAA amendments) - Steve Metalitz coordinator
>
> At our previous meeting, we had established a target date of November 9 for
> submission of lists of topics for possible RAA amendments. Several sets of
> lists were received and a few other topics were identified on the subteam B
> mailing list. Staff prepared a cumulative chart of the topics on these lists,
> and most of our November 18 meeting was spent reviewing this chart. A number
> of questions were raised, especially regarding items on the list submitted by
> a group of law enforcement representatives, and one of these representatives
> will be invited to our next meeting to present the joint law enforcement list
> and to answer questions. The date for the next meeting has not been set but
> is expected to be in early December.
>
> ccNSO update - Olga Cavalli
> .fm (Micronesia) and .zm (Zambia) are now ccNSO members number 98 and 99.
>
> Travel drafting team - Olga Cavalli
>
> The team met with ICANN Staff in Seoul. Constituencies and stakeholder groups
> should inform as soon as possible the names of participants and requested
> level of support.
> OSC Constituency & Stakeholder Group WT progress report - *15 November 2009 -
> Olga Cavalli
> Key Actions Completed/In-Progress
> First outcome document about In Kind Staff services was submitted to the OSC
> before the Seoul Meeting.
> Actions towards developing a global outreach program to broaden participation
> in constituencies will be reviewed in the next conference call.
> Red Flags
> A draft document with recommendations should be available by first week
> December, approx.
> Significant Schedule Changes
> Conference calls schedule is byweekly.
>
> OSC Community Coordination Communications Work Team - Mason Cole
> Right now the CCT is revising its recommendations based on feedback from the
> wider OSC. Ken Bour is helping us merge those recommendations into the
> document. I don't have a timeline for this but will try to get one.
>
> Constituency/Stakeholder Group Update Report For 23 November GNSO Council
> Meeting - Rob Hoggarth 18 November 2009
>
> Renewed "Re-confirmation" Effoorts for Existing GNSO Constituencies - The
> seating of the new GNSI Cpuncil now frees up some ICANN Board resources to
> address the "re-confirmation" of the existing GNSO Constituencies. Back in
> August of last year, the ICANN Board determined taht if potential new GNSO
> Constituencies were going to be subject to a certification process, then it
> was appropriate to set up a system by which existing GNSO Constituencies
> could be regularly evaluated as well. The Board adopted a concept of
> "re-confirming" the charters and operational mechanisms of each GNSO
> Constituency every three years (see-
> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-28aug08.htm)._
>
> The initial Constituency re-confirmation process was slated for earlier this
> year, but the process took a back seat as the Board focused its efforts on
> evaluation and approval of the new GNSO Stakeholder Group structures and
> approval of the processes and recommended Bylaws changes necessary for
> seating the new GNSO Council. Now that the Board has generally resolved those
> issues, it has set a deadline of March 2010 for formal re-submission of any
> revised re-confirmation proposals by the existing GNSO Constituencies and has
> directed the ICANN Staff to assist constituency leaders in developing those
> submissions (see - 30 October 2009 Board Meeting Resolutions - Consent Agenda
> Item 1.3<http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-30oct09-en.htm#1>).
>
> The GNSO Constituency Operations Work Team is also making progress on a set
> of recommendations for review by the Operating Steering Committee. A document
> may be completed by the work team next month and that work product could be
> combined with the re-confirmation effort.
>
> The Board is also awaiting charter updates to reflect the new Stakeholder
> Group structures from the Commercial and Business Users Constituency and the
> Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency and has instructed
> Staff to provide assistance in completing those efforts.
>
> _Potential New GNSO Constituencies Remain Under Consideration -_ICANN Board
> members conducted substantial discussions in Seoul regarding the proposals
> for four new GNSO Constituencies but took no formal action.__All four of the
> proposed new GNSO Constituency charters (CyberSafety, Consumers, City TLDs
> and IDNgTLDs) remain "pending." The latest public documents regarding the
> proposals are located here -
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm. The process also
> remains available for other interested parties to develop proposals for new
> GNSO Constituencies and to submit them to the Board.
>
> _Permanent Stakeholder Group Charters -_When the Board approved the four (4)
> new GNSO Stakeholder Group structures earlier this year it acknowledged that
> the charters for the Commercial Stakeholder Group and the Non Commercial
> Stakeholder Group were to be transitional/temporary and that permanent
> charters were to be developed over the course of the coming year. The Board
> is already examining some options being considered by the community for what
> permanent charters might look like. Based on discussions in Seoul, the Staff
> will be working to develop opportunities for dialogue and further community
> discussion of these important matters.
>
> Item 9: AOB
>
> Item 10: Reminder: The updated Action Item list at:
> http://gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/meetings/pending-action-list.pdf
>
> 10.1. Questions/comments?
>
> The agenda is also posted on the website
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-23nov09-en.htm
>
> Thank you very much.
> kind regards,
>
> Glen
>
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
phone: +1.914.374.0613
Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|