Re: [council] Priorities

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Am I the only one for which the actual methodology for the work this  
group is doing remains a mystery.
Sorry if I'm being dense, I've seen some interesting proposals for  
models for prioritizing the Council's work, but I just don't  
understand how the group is going about integrating this into a  
working model.
Stéphane

Le 16 nov. 2009 à 13:34, Olga Cavalli a écrit :

> Wolf,
> the most important task is to develop a methodology to defining the  
> action item categories and after that establishing priorities for  
> these categories.
> This should be an ongoing process with feedback from the whole  
> council.
> You are welcome to join the working group.
> Regards
> Olga
>
>
> 2009/11/16 <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Olga,
>
> is it just about developing a general (theoretical) method on how to  
> prioritize any work which may come up, or does this group deal with  
> concrete foreseeable tasks along which they are going to propose a  
> priority list for the future work? I would be interested in doing  
> the latter one.
> Best regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>
> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner- 
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Olga Cavalli
> Gesendet: Samstag, 14. November 2009 13:41
> An: GNSO Council
> Betreff: [council] Priorities
>
> Hi,
> After the Seoul meeting, a small group of council members are  
> working in developing a methodology for prioritizing GNSO work.
> If some of you may want to join the group please let me know, as we  
> will organize an email list.
> Best regards
> Olga
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
> www.south-ssig.com.ar

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature