RE: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Stéphane,



The wording is chosen to mean when the ccpdp process and not the IDN ccTLD
Fast Track process.

Hope this clarifies the issue.

 

Edmon

 

 

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:13 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG

 

Maybe I’m not understanding the proposed change. Does adding “Upon adoption
of either the Recommendations from the ccNSO policy development process on
the introduction and delegation of IDN ccTLDs” not mean that the JIG
effectively closes on Nov 16, the date the IDN ccTLD fast-track starts?

Stéphane


Le 31/10/09 01:09, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Glen,

Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov.  In the meantime, in my
opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me.  Does anyone think
differently?

Chuck


 

  _____  

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Glen de Saint  Géry
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM
To: Council  GNSO
Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG  WG

 
 
 





Forwarded  From: Bart Boswinkel  


Hi  Glen,
Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward  it
to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well?
The change  is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption
of IDN  ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook.
Kind  regards,
Bart