Re: [council] RE: [gnso-sti] Meeting Details for STI Review Team on Thursday Evening

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
Andrei, Terry and myself talked about this and we are ok with Andrei being
the NCA in the STI Review team.
Regards
Olga

2009/10/28 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  That would be fine Andrei.  It is up to you, Olga and Terry to decide.
>
> Chuck
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Andrei Kolesnikov
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:39 AM
> *To:* 'Margie Milam'; 'Council GNSO'; gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [council] RE: [gnso-sti] Meeting Details for STI Review Team on
> Thursday Evening
>
>  Should I propose myself as a NomCom rep into STI team? I missed this one
> at the gNSO meeting today.
>
>
>
> --andrei
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Margie Milam
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 27, 2009 9:19 AM
> *To:* Council GNSO; gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-sti] Meeting Details for STI Review Team on Thursday
> Evening
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> We have reserved the Astor Room on the 36th Floor for a face to face
> meeting of the STI Review Team on Thursday, October 29th from 5-6:30 pm.
>   As a reminder, each of the Stakeholder Groups should identify their
> representatives to the Review Team in accordance with the proposed motion
> that will be voted upon at the GNSO Council meeting on Wednesday.   For your
> information, the proposed motion is below.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Margie Milam
>
>
>
> Senior Policy Counselor
>
> ICANN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> WHEREAS, the ICANN Board has requested that the GNSO evaluate certain ICANN
> staff implementation proposals for the protection of trademarks in new gTLDs
> based in part on the recommendations from the IRT, public comments, and
> additional analysis undertaken by ICANN Staff, as described in the letter
> dated 12 October 2009 <<Letter from Rod Beckstrom & Peter Dengate Thrush
> to GNSO 
> Council<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/beckstrom-to-gnso-council-12oct09-en.pdf>
> >>.
>
>
>
> WHEREAS, the ICANN Board letter requests the GNSO’s view by December 14,
> 2009 on whether certain rights protection mechanisms for second level
> strings recommended by ICANN Staff based on public input are consistent with
> the GNSO’s proposed policy on the introduction of new gTLDs, and are the
> appropriate and effective options for achieving the GNSO’s stated principles
> and objectives;
>
>
>
> WHEREAS, the GNSO has reviewed the ICANN Board letter and desires to
> approve the procedures for conducting such evaluation;
>
>
>
> NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the GNSO adopts the following process to
> conduct the evaluation requested by the Board:
>
>
>
> 1.               A GNSO Review Team will be comprised of representatives
> designated as follows:  the Registrar and Registry Stakeholder Groups with
> two (2) representatives each,  the Commercial Stakeholder Groups and the
> Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups with four (4) representatives each, and
> At-Large with two (2) representatives and one representative from the
> Nominating Committee Appointees(1);
>
>
>
> 2.               Each of the Stakeholder Groups will solicit from their
> members their initial position statements on the questions and issues raised
> by the ICANN Board letter and the ICANN Staff proposed models for the
> implementation of the Trademark Clearinghouse and Uniform Rapid Suspension
> model, and will deliver their initial position statements on November 4, and
> with final position statements to be delivered by November 6, 2009;
>
>
>
> 3.               Such position statements will be summarized by ICANN
> Staff and distributed to the GNSO Review Team to evaluate whether a
> consensus can be reached on the ICANN Staff implementation models or other
> proposals for the protection of trademarks in the New gTLD Program; and
>
>
>
> The GNSO Review Team will conduct its analysis, identify those areas where
> consensus has already been reached, an seek to develop consensus on those
> issues for which consensus could not be determined. The GNSO Review Team
> will provide a final report to the GNSO on or before the GNSO council’s
> meeting in late November, 2009.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar