ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Motion to Adopt Updated Council Operating Procedures

The motion to amend the motion specifically deals with the abstention
issue.  If the amendment does not pass, then we could add language like


        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
        Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 8:51 PM
        To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [council] Motion to Adopt Updated Council Operating


        It is my understanding from our discussion yesterday that we had
rough consensus on voting to adopt the updated Council Operating
Procedures, but to state in the motion that certain areas remain
outstanding (e.g., abstentions) and to require that those areas be
priority work to be completed by a date certain.

        Two questions: 

        1.  Is that correct? 

        2.  What areas, other than abstentions, remain outstanding? 

        I'll start drafting a substitute motion once I've heard back
from enough of you so that I'm comfortable I'm on the right track.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>