ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Motion for using a secret ballot for the chair election on 28 Oct.

  • To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Motion for using a secret ballot for the chair election on 28 Oct.
  • From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:27:05 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <28F3C2DD-5A17-4A6E-AB26-EA5E4DB86DF6@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcpSjJrYIQw+6UvZSFyOnnbTUkOZygAAAxAA
  • Thread-topic: [council] Motion for using a secret ballot for the chair election on 28 Oct.

Thanks for clarifying. 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 4:23 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Motion for using a secret ballot for the chair
election on 28 Oct.



On 21 Oct 2009, at 16:16, Rosette, Kristina wrote:

> Thanks for the information, Avri.  Just so I'm clear:  Did anyone
> suggest that such a "gag rule" should/would/could be imposed?    
> Thanks!

No suggestions, only vague fears that someone else could/would suggest.
Plus there was the conversation on the list that sort of begged the
question, So for completeness sake, i asked the question.

a.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>