ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:52:52 +0200
  • Cc: Jean-Christophe Vignes <JCVIgnes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathon Nevett <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <C704A8CE.2DC3E%stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcpSNZT/VlYsNq3i0EGNWSuSglswVgAD2/JG
  • Thread-topic: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council
  • User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/

Please add Jean Christophe Vignes and Jon Nevett from the RrSG.


Le 21/10/09 12:02, « Stéphane Van Gelder » <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :

> Hi,
> On behalf of the RrSG, please add myself, Adrian Kinderis and RrSG Treasurer
> Jeff Eckhaus to this list.
> Stéphane
> Le 18/10/09 14:46, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
>> On 15 Oct 2009, at 14:23, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>>> If we do decide to go for a DT,
>> I think this is a good idea as a way to start and fits patterns that
>> have proven successful in taking the first steps in recent efforts.
>> I do not want to wipe the weekend end schedule for this, however, as
>> we have a published agenda for the weekend and have people committed
>> to those tasks who are planing to come to Seoul in time or those
>> meetings.
>> This does not minimize the importance of starting on the Board letter
>> on Specific Trademark Issues (STI) and DAGv3 and that is why I think
>> the suggestion about forming a DT a good idea.  Because of the press
>> of time, we cannot wait for a meeting to do this.  So I am suggesting
>> we start now.
>> I propose forming a DT composed of participants each SG and the active
>> Liaison groups who are willing to focus their time next week (perhaps
>> even finding time for a teleconference) and  on the weekend to come up
>> with a plan and start the work for the council to discuss/accept at
>> the Wednesday open meeting and at the Thursday meeting.
>> Unless there is strong objection from the members of the council, I
>> ask each SG to name 2-3 members and the active ACSO liaison groups to
>> name 1 representative each for the STI-DT  and ask Glen (or some
>> member of staff who is not traveling at the moment) to set up a
>> mailing list, with open archive, for that team immediately.  I think
>> it is a good suggestion for those SGs that have members who were on
>> the IRT as either members or observers to consider including them
>> among the 2-3 volunteers.  I think the SGs should find people in the
>> SG, not necessarily council members to populate these meeting - and
>> recommend that the people doing this find alternatives to replace (at
>> least temporarily) them in other other ongoing ICANN tasks (except of
>> course for council membership).
>> We do have some unused meting room space on Saturday (11am on), so I
>> suggest we schedule this group consider an open meeting during this
>> opne time.
>> The topic has already been scheduled for the Wednesday open meeting
>> (https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_28_oct_2009
>> ), and has already been spoken of as the main topic for the Thursday
>> meeting (https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?
>> agenda_29_oct_2009).
>> a.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>