ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Board-Staff-GNSOCouncil/leadership dinner

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Board-Staff-GNSOCouncil/leadership dinner
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:03:59 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <927658C7-9AF1-4837-AE7B-2D2DA751337A@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <927658C7-9AF1-4837-AE7B-2D2DA751337A@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcpQCOgPjJdhex20R4C9G7/T5M5ANwADA+aw
  • Thread-topic: [council] Board-Staff-GNSOCouncil/leadership dinner

Works for me.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 11:32 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Board-Staff-GNSOCouncil/leadership dinner
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have terminated the poll and include a snapshot below.
> 
> (Actually I include 2 snapshots.  One from before I made a 
> mistake and tried to edit the first column to say 'Specific 
> Trademark Issues'  
> instead of 'the
> TBD Board Letter' - did not realize that it would do what it 
> did to the poll.
> since I had restricted the poll to one answer per person, it 
> is still easy to count the 'edited' poll, however.  ad the 
> first snapeshot does show the lead
> topic)
> 
> DAGv3 and specific Trademark Issue got 11 votes AoC and its 
> implications got 9 votes Mitigating malicious conduct 
> measures got 2 votes
> 
> Since the first two are so close and since we have 
> successfully set two topics in previous dinners, one for the 
> main meal and one for the dessert, I am setting:
> 
> "DAGv3 and Specific Trademark Issues" as the dinner topic and 
> "AoC and its implications" for the dessert.
> 
> Thanks for doing the poll.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>