RE: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Two observations:

1. Since the clock started ticking on yesterday and ends on 14 
December, by the time the new Council is seated, just 6 working weeks 
will be left.
2. If this request for Council input is initially performed by a work 
group not directly mapping to Council, it will have to complete its 
work with sufficient time for the result to be formally approved by 
the GNSO reducing the effective time even more.
Alan

At 15/10/2009 10:30 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> We discussed this some in our RySG call yesterday.  The one clear
> position that was made is that the process should follow the practice we
> have been following in recent months and years to NOT restrict
> participation to just Councilors.
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 10:22 AM
> > To: Council GNSO
> > Subject: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Was just asked during another meeting  whether there was any
> > idea of what kind of work the Council would be engaged in in
> > order to meet the Board deadline on this.
> >
> > I had to admit that we wee still too busy on the transition
> > details to have discussed this at all on the list.
> >
> > I would like to invite the council to begin considering how
> > you want to handle this.  Hopefully discussions have already
> > begun in the SGs.
> >
> > One note: if we wait until the new council is seated to start
> > dealing with this we will have used one week of the council 8
> > weeks to get it done.
> >
> > a.
> >
> >