<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Position on NCA seatings
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Position on NCA seatings
- From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:47:14 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Ok, I've consulted with the current and incoming NCSG councilors, as
well as the current and incoming NCUC Exec. Committee. I have yet to
hear back from two of the three board appointees who'll be seated in
Seoul (not surprising, being new to the process and not yet
comfortably ensconced in office etc), but everyone else is unanimous
and it's been a week since the council call, so I'll report back now.
Our position is that the lottery results should stand. The council
agreed to a process, and Avri followed it just as the motion called
for. We do not believe that it a good practice to agree to all follow
a process and then toss its results because someone's first preference
is not realized. If there were second thoughts about how we were
proceeding, these should have been expressed and worked out prior to
the lottery deadline. But nobody challenged it, and only one of four
SGs clearly expressed a preference on the list before the default was
to kick in.
Cheers,
Bill
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|