ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts

  • To: <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts
  • From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:35:41 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702D3FABC@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702D3FA5C@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <A020F2BB31444D29A1414105EADFC7F8@secondgen.local> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702D3FABC@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Aco7bobroxomuNz7S8mvrQaOclOF9wAHFqvZAAJ+29AAAL4/HwAAL/JwAACai+AAALIWdwACac4mAAIyyqAACVafawAhecJgAACpAvAAB+KykAAa6B6g

Chuck wrote: Abstaining is not the same as not voting in my opinion.
David Mayer wrote: There is a real difference between abstaining and not voting.

Would either of you like to explain it ?
If you are correct are we in the new rules giving Council members present at a
meeting four options:
not voting


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>