[council] IRTP Part B and PEDNR Updates for Council Meeting
- To: "GNSO Council " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] IRTP Part B and PEDNR Updates for Council Meeting
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:32:17 -0700
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.1.13
IRTP Part B Update:
Continued discussions on defining terms.
Public comment period on charter issues is still open. Closes 5 October.
All SOIs of participants have now been collected.
Registrar Survey: Marika is ready to work on these, and will be reaching
out to known registrar reps for answers or an appropriate contact within
Discussion of a workshop during the Seoul meeting - scheduling & remote
access facilities, what other meetings may conflict, concern that new
gTLD sessions would take away our participants, potential conflict with
an ALAC event.
Public Comment summary and analysis
** 14 Comments Rec'd, 13 participants (1 commented twice)
** Answers grouped by charter questions.
** Feedback on other issues (not related to charter questions) were
** Constituency Statements: IPC, RSG not posted yet or included in
** Discussion of a "drop box" during Seoul to receive anonymous
Some discussion about Registry Practices. Notably, the extension of the
date during auto-renew grace period which could give registrants the
impression that the date had renewed.
Discussed a shift in the timeline. I will likely be posing this request
to the Council (2 wk extension).
Continued discussion on Charter question 1 - Does registrant have
sufficient opportunity to renew names prior to expiry?