ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] IRTP Part B and PEDNR Updates for Council Meeting

  • To: "GNSO Council " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] IRTP Part B and PEDNR Updates for Council Meeting
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:32:17 -0700
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.1.13

IRTP Part B Update:

Continued discussions on defining terms.

Public comment period on charter issues is still open. Closes 5 October.

PEDNR Update:

All SOIs of participants have now been collected.

Registrar Survey: Marika is ready to work on these, and will be reaching
out to known registrar reps for answers or an appropriate contact within
the organization.  

Discussion of a workshop during the Seoul meeting - scheduling & remote
access facilities, what other meetings may conflict, concern that new
gTLD sessions would take away our participants, potential conflict with
an ALAC event.

Public Comment summary and analysis
    ** 14 Comments Rec'd, 13 participants (1 commented twice)
    **  Answers grouped by charter questions.
    **  Feedback on other issues (not related to charter questions) were
also collected
    **  Constituency Statements:  IPC, RSG not posted yet or included in
    **  Discussion of a "drop box" during Seoul to receive anonymous

Some discussion about Registry Practices. Notably, the extension of the
date during auto-renew grace period which could give registrants the
impression that the date had renewed.

Discussed a shift in the timeline. I will likely be posing this request
to the Council (2 wk extension).

Continued discussion on Charter question 1 - Does registrant have
sufficient opportunity to renew names prior to expiry?


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>