<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Rodenbaugh Comment re GNSO Restructure Amendments to ICANN Bylaws
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Rodenbaugh Comment re GNSO Restructure Amendments to ICANN Bylaws
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:56:48 -0400
- Cc: gnso-council-draft2@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <75F0A821C5684662A5B5413CDBF73C85@HPLAPTOP>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <75F0A821C5684662A5B5413CDBF73C85@HPLAPTOP>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 24 Aug 2009, at 12:25, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:
Yet it is those "Non-Contracting" commercial interests that
essentially fund
by far the greatest portion of ICANN's budget through their domain
registration fees, and it is those commercial interests that make
domain
names valuable.
I question whether this is true or not and wonder if there have been
any studies done.
Yes, it is certain that registrants provide most all of ICANN funds.
But are most registrants, those providing the ICANN share of the
registration fee, commercial or non-commercial? organizations or
individuals?
My expectation is that it is individuals, but I would be curious to
know if there is any fact based data on this.
a
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|