Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009

[Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>]

...  as it was intended, Chuck  ...

RobH


On 8/10/09 11:34 AM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'll leave that one alone Rob.  :)

I took that in gest.

Chuck



________________________________
From: Robert Hoggarth  [mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009  11:03 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Philip Sheppard; Council  GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August  2009


Just for  clarification Chuck,  the hanging or the round of  drinks?

RobH


On 8/10/09 10:28 AM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:




Philip's answers sound reasonable to  me.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]  On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:18  AM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: RE: [council] Proposed GNSO  Council Agenda 13 August 2009
>
>
>
> Lets keep it  simple.
>
> Q: How long before  the meeting should they be  required to do so?
> A: Target 7 days, latest 24  hours.
>
> Q: And does the same rule apply to Council members  making
> report as liaisons and Staff members making reports?
>  A: Yes
>
> Q: Also what do we do if someone does not submit a  report -
> allow them to give it orally or just skip the  report?
> A: If staff, a hanging. If volunteers, a round of drinks  for
> the entire Council.
>
> Ok ...a sensible answer  ....
> A: Skip the report if not essential that day and allow it  to
> be submitted in the next 7 days.
>
>  Philip
>
>