ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting



Hi

Neither does NCUC.

Bill

On Jul 29, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:


Avri,

Does *mandate* have a particular meaning? I don't think we voted on this
position. For the record, I do not agree with funding both current and
new Councilors to Seoul.

Tim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul
meeting
From: "Zahid Jamil-DNDRC" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, July 29, 2009 7:54 am
To: "'Rosette, Kristina'" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


I support this letter as well.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ]
On
Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:14 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul
meeting


I support. Thanks for drafting, Avri.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:45 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting


hi,

At the last meeting I was asked to communicate with the Board requesting special consideration for travel at the next mtg. As I suggested at the time, I think it better to send this to Kevin Wilson, the CFO, as he is
in charge of the policy and is responsible for granting exceptions.

Of course if it is the will of the GNSO and the GNSO Council that I send
this to the Board, as well or instead, then I will do so.

Given what happened the last time I sent a letter with a 2 day notice, I
am going to send this letter 14 days after the last significant edit.
If there are no edits to the suggested wording or objections to the
sending of the letter, I will send it on: 10 august.

---

Letter to Kevin Wilson,

I have been mandated by the GNSO council to request support not only for
the members of the new bi-cameral council to be seated at Seoul, but
also for those current council members who may not be continuing on the
new council due to the reorganization.

The reason this request is being made is to provide continuity to the
GNSO council at this time of restructuring, reorganization and
'improvement.'

Thank you
Avri Doria
for the GNSO Council



***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
  Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>