ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Registry Operators

  • To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Registry Operators
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:18:14 +1000
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • In-reply-to: <08D4BD54F2DA4E958846EFB95F4E5C30@PSEVO>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3C09D81FAC@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702B8DD3A@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <08D4BD54F2DA4E958846EFB95F4E5C30@PSEVO>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcoEVamrQDRzJvsvTnSkZoe681bdNQAMi52wAACs2aAAF9hbAA==
  • Thread-topic: [council] Registry Operators

So how does this response help?

I'll simply proceed with my Registry Service Providers Constituency application 
and let the Board decide (and wait until the BC veto's their decision).


Adrian Kinderis

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2009 11:55 PM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: RE: [council] Registry Operators

its an old debate

No no no and no.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>