<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Scheduling of meetings
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Scheduling of meetings
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:24:01 +0200
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3C09A4942D@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcnkMP2YCg/segdxRUiEG9/oscZ+LAALlSsb
- Thread-topic: [council] Scheduling of meetings
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302
Adrian,
Are you suggesting that this be a topic for our Sunday dinner with the Board
(which was the topic of this discussion)? If so, although I agree that the
topic needs discussion, I don¹t think it¹s necessarily our top priority for
the Board dinner.
Stéphane
Le 03/06/09 11:52, « Adrian Kinderis » <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Avri,
>
> Can I suggest a topic for discussion by the GNSO in Sydney?
>
> I think we need to look at how we schedule our meetings. As I previously
> brought up and as was briefly commented on (largely by Chuck and Avri) I think
> that Doodles are not appropriate. They make it a popularity contest whereby
> the most unpopular vote always loses. Given that time zones don¹t change it
> really doesn¹t help those that are in the minority and outside of the
> ³popular² time zone.
>
> I understand it is incredibly hard to schedule meetings when participants are
> scattered all over the world but I would favour a rotation process that shared
> it around irrespective of numbers.
>
> Happy to have this discussion on Saturday or Sunday if deemed appropriate.
> Note I¹ll be as sharp as a tack (no jet lag for me!).
>
> Thanks.
>
> Adrian Kinderis (GMT/ UTC +10)
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|