<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
- To: "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:09:54 -0400
- Cc: "Ray Fassett" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20090522142725.ECAA08363@mailscan1.ncs.mcgill.ca>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <20090522142725.ECAA08363@mailscan1.ncs.mcgill.ca>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acna6r+TsmZPXf+ZRdu2PADkStdgowABELfQ
- Thread-topic: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
Good point Alan. This sounds to be like an issue that may need to be
considered by the GNSO Operations and/or the GNSO
Constituency/Stakeholder Group WTs under the OSC, so I cc'd the chairs
of those teams.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:23 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
>
>
> We are working on the proposed Bylaw revisions for Articles X
> and XX, and have been promised revisions related to Annex A,
> but unless I missed it, we have had no discussion at all
> about Article VII, regarding how Nominating Committee
> delegates are selected. Since the seven GNSO delegates are
> tied to the current Constituencies (2 for the BC and 1 for
> each other Constituency), this would surely have to change in
> the new model. At first glance, this is potentially a
> controversial issue.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|