ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII

  • To: "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:09:54 -0400
  • Cc: "Ray Fassett" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <20090522142725.ECAA08363@mailscan1.ncs.mcgill.ca>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <20090522142725.ECAA08363@mailscan1.ncs.mcgill.ca>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acna6r+TsmZPXf+ZRdu2PADkStdgowABELfQ
  • Thread-topic: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII

Good point Alan.  This sounds to be like an issue that may need to be
considered by the GNSO Operations and/or the GNSO
Constituency/Stakeholder Group WTs under the OSC, so I cc'd the chairs
of those teams. 

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:23 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Bylaw revisions - Article VII
> 
> 
> We are working on the proposed Bylaw revisions for Articles X 
> and XX, and have been promised revisions related to Annex A, 
> but unless I missed it, we have had no discussion at all 
> about Article VII, regarding how Nominating Committee 
> delegates are selected. Since the seven GNSO delegates are 
> tied to the current Constituencies (2 for the BC and 1 for 
> each other Constituency), this would surely have to change in 
> the new model. At first glance, this is potentially a 
> controversial issue.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>