<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [liaison6c] RE: [council] Board action on GNSO Restructuring
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, liaison6c <liaison6c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alac-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [liaison6c] RE: [council] Board action on GNSO Restructuring
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:51:55 +0200
- In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702A6A89A@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcnaMpa9Ye7rIpxhRsKqQEfquP++FgAAKBnQAABO1H0=
- Thread-topic: [liaison6c] RE: [council] Board action on GNSO Restructuring
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302
It would also be nice to have a clear idea of the new schedule the Board has
in mind. When do they now expect the new council to sit, Korea or before?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 21/05/09 18:45, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Thanks for the timely feedback Denise. I note that the Board recognized that
> "the restructuring schedule has slipped past Sydney" but it is very important
> for the GNSO to have a specific decision regarding the June target date for
> Council restructuring. Was any clear decision made in this regard?
>
> Chuck
>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Denise Michel
>> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 12:25 PM
>> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; liaison6c;
>> alac-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [council] Board action on GNSO Restructuring
>>
>>
>> Dear Community Members:
>>
>> At today's Board meeting, Directors considered the status of Stakeholder
>> Group (SG) formation and acknowledged that the GNSO community has made an
>> effort to comply with the Board's timetable for GNSO restructuring (i.e.
>> seating a new Council in Sydney), that the Board has received proposed SG
>> charters for review, and that the restructuring schedule has slipped past
>> Sydney. The Board approved a resolution that: noted that the proposed SG
>> charters require revisions to ensure equitable participation and
>> representation by new constituencies; directed the Board's Structural
>> Improvements Committee (SIC) and ICANN Staff to propose changes to the SG
>> charters to make them consistent with the Board¹s stated objectives; and
>> directed the SIC to post the revised charters, and an explanatory
>> memorandum, for GNSO consultation and public comment.
>>
>> The resolution will be posted by the Board Secretariat shortly at
>> <http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/>, but I wanted to alert you to this
>> development ASAP. Additional information will be posted/distributed as soon
>> as it's available.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Denise
>>
>>
>> Denise Michel
>> ICANN Vice President
>> Policy Development
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|