ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [liaison6c] RE: [council] Board action on GNSO Restructuring

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, liaison6c <liaison6c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alac-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [liaison6c] RE: [council] Board action on GNSO Restructuring
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:51:55 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702A6A89A@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcnaMpa9Ye7rIpxhRsKqQEfquP++FgAAKBnQAABO1H0=
  • Thread-topic: [liaison6c] RE: [council] Board action on GNSO Restructuring
  • User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/

It would also be nice to have a clear idea of the new schedule the Board has
in mind. When do they now expect the new council to sit, Korea or before?



Le 21/05/09 18:45, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Thanks for the timely feedback Denise.  I note that the Board recognized that
> "the restructuring schedule has slipped past Sydney" but it is very important
> for the GNSO to have a specific decision regarding the June target date for
> Council restructuring.  Was any clear decision made in this regard?
> Chuck
>>  From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Denise  Michel
>> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 12:25 PM
>> To:  council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; liaison6c;
>> alac-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [council] Board  action on GNSO Restructuring
>> Dear Community Members:
>> At today's Board meeting, Directors  considered the status of Stakeholder
>> Group (SG) formation and acknowledged  that the GNSO community has made an
>> effort to comply with the Board's  timetable for GNSO restructuring (i.e.
>> seating a new Council in Sydney), that  the Board has received proposed SG
>> charters for review, and that the  restructuring schedule has slipped past
>> Sydney.  The Board approved a  resolution that: noted that the proposed SG
>> charters require revisions to  ensure equitable participation and
>> representation by new constituencies;  directed the Board's Structural
>> Improvements Committee (SIC) and ICANN Staff  to propose changes to the SG
>> charters to make them consistent with the Board¹s  stated objectives; and
>> directed the SIC to post the revised charters, and an  explanatory
>> memorandum, for GNSO consultation and public comment.
>> The  resolution will be posted by the Board Secretariat shortly at
>> <http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/>,  but I wanted to alert you to this
>> development ASAP.  Additional  information will be posted/distributed as soon
>> as it's  available.
>> Regards,
>> Denise
>> Denise  Michel
>> ICANN Vice President
>> Policy Development

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>