ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] GAC letter on Geographic Names

  • To: Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] GAC letter on Geographic Names
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 18:56:57 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAGPKy8XSHjZGrvfrIUh8GPQCgQAAEAAAAHuR9l7Ufm1Dl26zQw9I0JkBAAAAAA==@jamilandjamil.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcnPJFsuVelmcfRuQHKBF3X2hT4J7ACa/i5v
  • Thread-topic: [council] GAC letter on Geographic Names
  • User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302

Thanks Zahid,

I have included the gist of your very useful comments in the draft I have
prepared.

Stéphane


Le 07/05/09 16:59, « Zahid Jamil » <zahid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Of much concern to me is:
>  
> ³In relation to potential misuse of the respective names on the second level:
>  
> In the event that a government or relevant public authority (or the GAC)
> notifies ICANN that there is misuse of any second level domain name in
> relation to the provisions of article 2 of the GAC principles, ICANN shall
> notify the registry and request the suspension of the said name pending the
> withdrawal of the objection by the relevant government. GAC considers that the
> respect for such provisions and procedures needs to be a contractual
> obligation on the part of the registry.²
>  
> So government or ?relevant public authority¹ get a complete veto over any
> domain name and there isn¹t even a the possibility of a dispute resolution
> process.  So governments or ?relevant public authority¹¹s could abuse this.
> this is not transparent.
>  
> Zahid Jamil
> Barrister-at-law
> Jamil & Jamil
> Barristers-at-law
> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
> Cell: +923008238230
> Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
> Fax: +92 21 5655026
> www.jamilandjamil.com <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/>
>  
> Notice / Disclaimer
> This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
> communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
> recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
> notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by
> mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the
> intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute
> privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The
> reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever
> of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by
> electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use
> of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil &
> Jamil is prohibited.
>  
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>