ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] TLD Operational concerns -- A Perfect example...

  • To: "Terry L Davis, P.E." <tdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] TLD Operational concerns -- A Perfect example...
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:42:10 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <005501c9c755$3dbb1c30$b9315490$@net>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcnHVTxhKj/+3fo6TTadTEhbHo5RPAAAd92x
  • Thread-topic: [council] TLD Operational concerns -- A Perfect example...
  • User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302

Hi Terry,

I don¹t see any example of fundamental operational difficulties linked with
TLDs in the example your describe.

All I see is a mismanaged domain name transfer from one registrar to
another...

Stéphane


Le 27/04/09 18:28, « Terry L Davis, P.E. » <tdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> All
>  
> Earlier this year some of you all wondered what my operational concerns were
> with simultaneous starting of the new TLD and IDNs. This is just too perfect
> an example not to share!
>  
> If you try, to bring up www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org> right now.  Some of
> you all will get ³cannot find web server²!
>  
> I was on a call with ISOC this morning on some other issues.  At the end of
> the call, I asked them why their website was down.  It wasn¹t actually down
> and  using the IP address instead of the URL, it worked fine (which won¹t even
> be doable by anyone other than a network engineer in IPv6).  But it didn¹t
> resolve on at least AT&T and Comcast from Seattle.
>  
> They just emailed back with the cause.  They switched registrars today and had
> only a partial transfer occur to the TLDs.
>  
> TLD operations up to now have as much been networked via ³personal contacts²
> as by technology since there were only a dozen or so TLD operators globally.
> Our technology will need to significantly improve to insure coordination and
> security between what will be a growing number of TLD and IDN-TLD operators;
> and IDN alone adds tremendously to the DNS technical complexity.
>  
> Anyway good food for discussions over a late night drink in Sydney.
>  
> Take care
> Terry
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>