<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Formal Petition and Charter of Proposed IDNgTLD Constituency
- To: Kristina Rosette <krosette@xxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Formal Petition and Charter of Proposed IDNgTLD Constituency
- From: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:10:24 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C7270617BA04@cbiexm04dc.cov.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcnBs07u0eYRVqWBQ++FY0FgOYJa6wAFrkrYAACo0fAAAXXiKg==
- Thread-topic: [council] Formal Petition and Charter of Proposed IDNgTLD Constituency
Kristina and Avri:
Based on discussions between the proponents and staff, my impression is that
the "typo" is in the Charter document Membership section. Certainly an
important distinction that will need to be clarified before we post the
petition for public comment.
Best,
Rob Hoggarth
On 4/20/09 8:29 AM, "Kristina Rosette" <krosette@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Are you sure that's not a typo? 5.1.1 restricts membership to noncommercial
organizations, and 5.2.1 restricts membership to individuals who own domain
names for personal or family use.
K
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 11:10 AM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Formal Petition and Charter of Proposed IDNgTLD
Constituency
Dear Avri:
Yes.
Per the first paragraph of the IDNgTLD Petition Transmittal Letter:
"Pursuant to the processes established by the ICANN staff, please accept the
attached Petition and proposed Charter for the Internationalized Domain Name
Top Level Domain (IDNgTLD) Constituency (IDNgTLDC) that we believe most
appropriately positions within the Commercial Stakeholders Group (CSG)."
Best regards,
Rob Hoggarth
On 4/20/09 5:26 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
hi,
Just to be clear, are they are applying for membership in the Commercial
Users Stakeholder Group?
a.
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 01:09 -0700, Robert Hoggarth wrote:
> Dear GNSO Council Members;
>
> For your information, attached please find a copy of the Formal
> Petition and Charter package of the proposed new IDNgTLD Constituency
> submitted formally this past weekend by Dr. S. Subbiah of i-DNS.net,
> Inc.
>
> This is now the third formal new constituency petition submitted to
> the Board in the context of the GNSO Improvements effort. The Staff
> will soon open a 30-day Public Comment Forum regarding the Petition.
> Any comments submitted in the Forum will be summarized for the
> community and Board's review.
>
> I will also be sending copies of the submission package to the GNSO
> Constituencies list as an FYI. The document will also be posted on
> the GNSO Improvements web page at
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm .
>
> Please drop me a line if you have any questions or comments on this
> matter.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rob Hoggarth
>
> Robert L. Hoggarth, Esq.
> Senior Policy Director
> ICANN
>
> 424 558 4805
> robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|