ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Formal Petition and Charter of Proposed IDNgTLD Constituency

  • To: Kristina Rosette <krosette@xxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Formal Petition and Charter of Proposed IDNgTLD Constituency
  • From: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:10:24 -0700
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C7270617BA04@cbiexm04dc.cov.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcnBs07u0eYRVqWBQ++FY0FgOYJa6wAFrkrYAACo0fAAAXXiKg==
  • Thread-topic: [council] Formal Petition and Charter of Proposed IDNgTLD Constituency

Kristina and Avri:

Based on discussions between the proponents and staff, my impression is that 
the "typo" is in the Charter document Membership section. Certainly an 
important distinction that will need to be clarified before we post the 
petition for public comment.

Best,

Rob Hoggarth


On 4/20/09 8:29 AM, "Kristina Rosette" <krosette@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Are you sure that's not a typo?  5.1.1 restricts membership to noncommercial 
organizations, and 5.2.1 restricts membership to individuals who own domain 
names for personal or family use.

K



________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Robert  Hoggarth
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 11:10 AM
To: Avri  Doria
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Formal  Petition and Charter of Proposed IDNgTLD 
Constituency


Dear  Avri:

Yes.

Per the first paragraph of the IDNgTLD Petition  Transmittal Letter:


"Pursuant to  the processes established by the ICANN staff, please accept the 
attached  Petition and proposed Charter for the Internationalized Domain Name 
Top  Level Domain (IDNgTLD) Constituency (IDNgTLDC) that we believe most  
appropriately positions within the Commercial Stakeholders Group  (CSG)."

Best regards,

Rob Hoggarth


On  4/20/09 5:26 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>  wrote:


hi,

Just to be clear, are they are applying  for membership in the Commercial
Users Stakeholder  Group?

a.



On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 01:09 -0700, Robert  Hoggarth wrote:
> Dear GNSO Council Members;
>
> For your  information, attached please find a copy of the Formal
> Petition and  Charter package of the proposed new IDNgTLD Constituency
> submitted  formally this past weekend by Dr. S. Subbiah of i-DNS.net,
>  Inc.
>
> This is now the third formal new constituency petition  submitted to
> the Board in the context of the GNSO Improvements  effort. The Staff
> will soon open a 30-day Public Comment Forum  regarding the Petition.
>  Any comments submitted in the Forum  will be summarized for the
> community and Board's  review.
>
> I will also be sending copies of the submission  package to the GNSO
> Constituencies list as an FYI.  The  document will also be posted on
> the GNSO Improvements web page  at
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm  .
>
> Please drop me a line if you have any questions or  comments on this
> matter.
>
> Best  regards,
>
> Rob Hoggarth
>
> Robert L. Hoggarth,  Esq.
> Senior Policy Director
> ICANN
>
> 424 558  4805
> robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>