ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Motion on Whois Service requirements activity

  • To: <avri@xxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Motion on Whois Service requirements activity
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:29:27 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <1239733110.13126.19252.camel@bower>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <1239733110.13126.19252.camel@bower>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acm9LpIupruskKpnSJ+YK9VFElcvUQAAFgfw
  • Thread-topic: [council] Motion on Whois Service requirements activity

Second confirmed.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 2:19 PM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] Motion on Whois Service requirements activity
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> After a conversation with some of the staff about this motion 
> and the work it involves, it became obvious I should amend 
> the motion based on work load and work priorities.
> 
> I am changing:
> 
> The synthesis of requirements should be done in consultation 
> with the SSAC, ALAC, GAC and the ccNSO and should be ready 
> for community discussion in time for the Sydney meeting.
> 
> to:
> 
> The synthesis of requirements should be done in consultation 
> with the SSAC, ALAC, GAC and the ccNSO and a strawman 
> proposal should be prepared for these consultations. The 
> Staff is asked to come back with an estimate of when this 
> would be possible.
> 
> 
> Chuck, who has seconded the motion, accepts the amendment as well.
> 
> thanks
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>