RE: [council] Action Item related to Whois Service Requirements

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I think a prioritization exercise is a good idea, but I am not sure that
now is the time for it.  It might be a great thing for the new
bi-cameral council to take on as part of its initial work especially
given its role as a manager of the policy process.  I also believe that
it is part of the policy strategy process that is also required by the
'improvements' plan.

One of the problems with prioritization that I would flag, is that there
always needs to be consideration of the interrupt driven work which
often ends up the most critical and goes to the top of the list.

a.


On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 06:50 -0700, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> My concern is prioritizing at the Council level. Managing the policy
> process should include some consideration of time and resource
> management. That will naturally allow Staff to prioritize, or as
> Philip
> suggested, allow us to direct Staff appropriately on priority of the
> work we've asked for.
>