RE: [council] Action Item related to Whois Service Requirements

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

To work well, it would help if we have prioritized our work at the
Council level to begin with.

Tim 
  -------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Action Item related to Whois Service
Requirements
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, April 08, 2009 7:57 am
To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "GNSO Council"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Philip,

Your suggested approach would seem to accomplish what I intended.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:24 AM
> To: 'GNSO Council'
> Subject: RE: [council] Action Item related to Whois Service 
> Requirements
> 
> 
> Chuck wrote:
> "Maybe we should start by asking Staff whether they have the 
> bandwidth to take this on at this time and if not request an 
> estimate as to when they think they would be able to do so".
> 
> ---------------------
> Chuck, this seems a little backwards and implies every 
> current issue occupying staff time has greater priority than 
> future ideas such as this.
> A better way to proceed is for Council to make as many 
> requests of staff as we deem necessary.
> Staff management then respond and indicate resource 
> constraints. They list the activities they are doing and 
> request Council to prioritise the list.
> We prioritise.
> Staff act.
> 
> Philip
> 
>