ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FW: [gnso-whois-dt] ALAC WHOIS results

  • To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FW: [gnso-whois-dt] ALAC WHOIS results
  • From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:47:41 -0800
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcmYS7dX45b0gWbbR3ezp3Z+3pDthgD07hhg
  • Thread-topic: [gnso-whois-dt] ALAC WHOIS results


Yesterday the ALAC voted to approve the priorities identified in the attached 
as the official ALAC view on WHOIS studies.

Thanks, Liz

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 9:29 AM
To: Council GNSO; gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Cheryl Langdon-Orr
Subject: [gnso-whois-dt] ALAC WHOIS results

Steve Metalitz just pointed out that I had not sent this as I said I would at 
last week's Council meeting.  My apologies.

The ALAC is in the process of voting on this submission, and the result will be 
finalized on Monday, March 2nd.

The attached spreadsheet gives the ALAC priorities. It also gives the averages 
before the ALAC vote, and after, with those above 2.5 highlighted in green.

With a threshold of 2.5, the ALAC vote include two addition studies. 
If the threshold is increased to 2.65, the final list remains the same as 
before the ALAC submission.


Attachment: ALAC-Whois-VoteTally.xls
Description: ALAC-Whois-VoteTally.xls

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>