ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] ACSO meeting

  • To: avri@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [council] ACSO meeting
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:05:32 -0200
  • Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=B305IUeaSWc7U5Quc76mqKSbOJ5cZRyROCUt7Kb5WqM=; b=YVRLypgDMANaszdy371K07ktlvPrmxJWykgFI5oTUvP1yJHS5le2XEGLXvu/TkfMF8 85JYDRRTpHMJDeJnGe9eIhv1l/GDXieRnH1alfKs9kSaSGhnHWu02f39mBlkUIi4h+fO jVa2cdbWnyMfbe3fAIXevOo61cyVfyEBcaers=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=mLisR6NlZI43cT8X3ahjoUvejunE76TrT+p9cy15rOpr71JxM7zD/jiHlbSsXB/gPk WcihS0hWOx7fAtGfJtYwvo3TSwidDAi/DKUq6/gJ4PhvxjzMgMzGzrZ23P99t+pcGEeh tW4csAglFVV3xThGPOer72+TlMsVkRRu87HYc=
  • In-reply-to: <1234532743.6886.219.camel@bower>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <1234518616.6886.16.camel@bower> <bccbb21a0902130533t5afdba5o4d0b937b77ac1917@mail.gmail.com> <1234532743.6886.219.camel@bower>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Avri,
Both alternatives are ok with me.
I volunteer to participate.
Regards
Olga

2009/2/13 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>

>
>
> Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> As a NCA, you do not belong to a Stakeholder group as defined in the
> GNSO, though in time you will probably6 belong to one of the two
> chambers.
>
> I think there are two alternatives:
>
> - either one of the stakeholder groups could take your interest into
> account and consider you as one of the participants.
>
> - or if you or others object to this being handled in the proto-SGs, we
> can we decide to bring it in the whole council for a council wide
> decision of the participants.
>
>
> a.
>
>
> On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 11:33 -0200, Olga Cavalli wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am not sure to which proto-SG I belong or if I do belong to a
> > proto-SG.
> > I would be interested in participating.
> > Regards
> > Olga
> >
> > 2009/2/13 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> >         Hi,
> >
> >         The enclosed memo covers the resolution we came to on this
> >         meetings ACSO
> >         experiment.  I am available to answer any question anyone
> >         might have.  I
> >         hope you find that the topics bear a strong resemblance to
> >         some of our
> >         suggestions.
> >
> >         The next task is to pick the participants from the GNSO.  A
> >         couple
> >         boundary conditions:
> >
> >         -  Every ACSO gets 3 maybe 4 participants at the table.  I
> >         mentioned
> >         that because of the restructuring we were doing into SGs, that
> >         I thought
> >         we could do with 4 but did not believe we could do with fewer
> >         then 4.
> >         The SSAC chair was kind enough to allow us one of theirs, if
> >         needed, to
> >         make sure we had 4.  There will be a maximum of 20 people at
> >         the table.
> >
> >         - We have decided that chairs would NOT be at the table.
> >
> >         - We can seat different people for each of the sessions.
> >          Though we can
> >         also seat the same person for both if we choose.
> >
> >         At this point, unless there is objection, I suggest that each
> >         proto-SG
> >         pick its participants and let the list know so that I can pull
> >         the list
> >         together.  Please do this as soon as it is practical and
> >         please pass
> >         this message on to those who are responsible for setting up
> >         the SGs.
> >
> >         Thanks
> >
> >         a.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>