<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Motion on Individual Users in the GNSO.
With regards to involving individual
users, what about the IEEE ? I just
checked their website:
www.ieee.org
The members are individuals (engineering
professionals), and would appear to
qualify as "users" of the Internet?
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>; <avri@xxxxxxx>;
"GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 1:37 PM
Subject: RE: [council] Motion on Individual Users in the GNSO.
I recommend that we not make a huge issue out of this and simply identify
some individual users to work with the ALAC. First of all, we do not have
time because, even with the Board extension, we have to provide any
recommendations by 20 February. Secondly, the key is really to try and
develop some sound recommendations about how to involve individual users
in the GNSO without being duplicative with the ALAC. If there are
individuals from anywhere in the GNSO that are available and willing to
contribute constructively to the work that the ALAC is doing in response
to the Board's request, volunteer, but do it quickly because the work is
already ongoing and will be over before we know it.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 4:08 AM
To: avri@xxxxxxx; GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Motion on Individual Users in the GNSO.
Two good questions.
If we are seeking ind. user representatives, it would be nice
to know that's what they actually are and that they do truly
represent the constituency they are claiming to represent.
On the other hand, it is true that we could probably all
qualify as ind.
users.
So the risk here is that the ind. user group becomes a kind
of "catch-all".
Stéphane Van Gelder
Le 06/02/09 06:04, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 09:37 +0500, Zahid Jamil wrote:
>>
>> Would there be a need to justify that persons involved need to
>> represent an individual users perspective rather than overly
>> conflicting with other interests?
>>
>
> How does one do this?
>
> In some sense aren't we all individual users? So would it
not be up
> to each volunteer to indicate whether they felt they could
represent
> the viewpoint of an individual user in this particular effort?
>
> a.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|