RE: [council] Motion on Individual Users in the GNSO.

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Indeed.  As such any of us who may be representing organisations would also
be able to volunteer.  

 

Is that the intention?  

 

If so some from the CBUC may wish to volunteer as well.  I understand that
the BC may then wish to put some names forward as well.

 

Best regards,

 

Zahid

 

 

Notice / Disclaimer

This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law,
and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client
privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of
any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing
it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or
incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written
permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: 06 February 2009 14:08
To: avri@xxxxxxx; GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Motion on Individual Users in the GNSO.

 

 

Two good questions.

If we are seeking ind. user representatives, it would be nice to know that's

what they actually are and that they do truly represent the constituency

they are claiming to represent.

 

On the other hand, it is true that we could probably all qualify as ind.

users.

 

So the risk here is that the ind. user group becomes a kind of "catch-all".

 

Stéphane Van Gelder

 

 

Le 06/02/09 06:04, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :

 

> 

> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 09:37 +0500, Zahid Jamil wrote:

>> 

>> Would there be a need to justify that persons involved need to

>> represent an individual users perspective rather than overly

>> conflicting with other interests?

>> 

> 

> How does one do this?

> 

> In some sense aren't we all individual users?  So would it not be up to

> each volunteer to indicate whether they felt they could represent the

> viewpoint of an individual user in this particular effort?

> 

> a.

>