<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] GNSO Council Resolutions 29 January 2009
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] GNSO Council Resolutions 29 January 2009
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:42:10 -0800
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcmCYtJrh2sXrjk6Rd2AzdTVt+1blw==
- Thread-topic: GNSO Council Resolutions 29 January 2009
Dear Council Members,
Ahead of the complete minutes please find the resolutions that were passed at
the GNSO Council meeting on 29 January 2009.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Motion 1
Election of GNSO Council vice chair
====================================
Council approved the election of Chuck Gomes as the GNSO Council vice chair for
the period running concurrently with that of the GNSO Council chair for the
period 1 February 2009 until the newly structured GNSO Council is seated and a
new chair is elected.
Passed by voice vote.
One abstention from Chuck Gomes
Motion 2
Motion to approve Operation Steering Committee (OSC) charter
================================================
Motion proposed by Chuck Gomes seconded by Olga Cavalli
Whereas:
* The GNSO Council reviewed and accepted the new GNSO Improvements
Implementation
Plan<http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-implementation-plan-16oct08.pdf>
PDF, 96K<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?PDF%2C%2096K> developed
by the Planning Team at its 16 October meeting.
* That Plan called for the creation of an Operations Steering Committee
(OSC) to oversee efforts to enhance the GNSO's structure, constituencies, and
communications.
* The OSC was formed and held six teleconference meetings and conducted
various online discussions as of 21 January 2009.
* The OSC reviewed and modified the draft OSC Charter prepared by the GNSO
Improvements Planning Team and recommended that the Council approve the revised
draft Charter dated 22 Dec 08.
* The Council discussed the charter in its 8 January 2009 meeting and two
Councilors suggested edits.
* All OSC members approved the charter with the proposed edits as found at
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?operations_steering_committee_osc.
Resolve:
* The GNSO Council approves the OSC Charter and directs the OSC to proceed
in fulfilling the terms of that Charter.
The motion passed unanimously by voice vote
Motion 3
Motion to approve Policy Process Steering Committee (PPSC) Charter
==================================================================
Motion proposed by Tim Ruiz, seconded by Greg Ruth
Whereas:
The GNSO Council reviewed and accepted the new GNSO Improvements Implementation
Plan developed by the Planning Team at its 16 October meeting.
That Plan called for the creation of a Policy Process Steering Committee (PPSC)
to oversee efforts to revise and enhance the GNSO's Policy Development Process.
The PPSC was formed and held three teleconference meetings and conducted
various online discussions as of 7 January 2009.
The PPSC reviewed and modified the draft PPSC Charter prepared by the 'GNSO
Improvements Planning Team and recommends that the Council approve the revised
draft Charter dated 7 January 2009 and contained at the committee's wiki site
at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/index.cgi?policy_process_steering_committee_ppsc.
Resolve:
The GNSO Council approves the PPSC Charter and directs the PPSC to proceed in
fulfilling the terms of that Charter.
The motion passed unanimously by voice vote
Motion 4
Motion re: Individual Users in the GNSO
=======================================
Motion proposed by Chuck Gomes seconded by Bill Drake with friendly amendments
by Alan Greenberg
Whereas:
* On 11 December 2008, the ICANN Board approved Resolution 2008-12-11-02
seeking a recommendation on how to incorporate the legitimate interests of
individual Internet users in the GNSO in constructive yet non-duplicative ways
and requesting that the recommendation should be submitted no later than 24
January 2009 for consideration by the Board.
* In an email message to the GNSO Council list dated 20 January 2009, the
ICANN Vice President, Policy Development clarified that the11 December
Resolution is an effort to help the Board identify a strategic solution that
balances ALAC/At-Large and GNSO opportunities for all user and registrant
stakeholders.
* The Working Group on GNSO Council Restructuring Report sent to the ICANN
Board of Directors on 25 July 2008 recommended that the Non-Contracted
Party/User House would be open to membership of all interested parties that use
or provide services for the Internet, with the obvious exclusion of the
contracted parties and should explicitly not be restricted to domain
registrants as recommended by the BGC and that such recommendation was made in
response to the suggestion of the ALAC Liaison to the Council.
* The GNSO Council Chair previously contacted the ALAC Chair and the GNSO
ALAC Liaison to discuss this topic.
* The potential members of the two GNSO Council Non-Contracted Party
Stakeholder Groups have been tasked with submitting proposed Stakeholder Group
Charters to the ICANN Board prior to the Board meeting on 6 March 2009.
Resolve:
* The Council requests the GNSO Council ALAC Liaison in consultation with
the ALAC Chair to:
* Determine whether the ALAC and At-Large community have any concerns
with regard to the recommendation that membership in the Non-Contracted
Party/User House would be open to individual Internet users in addition to
domain name registrants and, if so, to communicate those concerns to the GNSO
Council as soon as practical
* Determine whether the ALAC and At-Large community would like the GNSO
to identify some user representatives, especially individual users, who would
be willing to work with the ALAC and At-Large community to develop a
recommendation regarding the Board's request that could be forwarded to the
appropriate groups for their consideration in developing a stakeholder group
charter and to the Board for action on GNSO improvement recommendations.
* If in either case the ALAC or At-large community do not accept this
proposal the GNSO council may reconsider the issue.
* Provide weekly progress reports to the Council list regarding the above.
* The Council directs the Council Chair to:
* Apologize to the Board that it failed to meet the Board established
deadline of 24 January
* Inform the Board that the GNSO:
* Is awaiting information from the ALAC.
* Is willing in cooperation with users to identify user
representatives, especially individual users, who would be willing to work with
the ALAC and At-Large community to develop a recommendation.
* Will promptly consider next steps and respond to the Board as
quickly as possible after requested information is received from the ALAC as
well any recommendation that may be developed by the ALAC and At-Large
community.
The motion passed unanimously by voice vote
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|