RE: [council] [Motion on users and GNSO]

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan,
 
The motion is not intended to exclude individual noncommercial users who
are involved in the NCUC but is worded to include any users who are not
part of the NCUC.  One source of the latter might be the GNSO GA list.
I believe that we already have a couple people in that category on the
Council: Avri and Olga.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
        Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 1:43 PM
        To: GNSO Council
        Subject: Re: [council] [Motion on users and GNSO]
        
        
        I have a question. Assuming the answer regarding the clause
below is yes, where/how do you envisage quickly finding these user
representatives. Since their task will be to work with ALAC and At-Large
to develop a recommendation to be "forwarded to the NCUC for their
consideration", the implication is that they themselves are not from
NCUC.
        
        Alan
        
        At 22/01/2009 08:23 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
        

                My apologies for being several hours late, but I would
like to make the motion that is attached and copied below for
consideration at our 29 Jan meeting.  A second is welcome as are
friendly amendments.
                ..... 

                        *       Determine whether the ALAC and At-Large
community would like the GNSO to identify some noncommercial user
representatives, especially individual users, who would be willing to
work with the ALAC and At-Large community to develop a recommendation
regarding the Board's request that could be forwarded to the NCUC for
their consideration in developing a stakeholder group charter and to the
Board for action on GNSO improvement recommendations. 

                ......