<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Follow up on new gTLDs call.
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Follow up on new gTLDs call.
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:31:56 -0500
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
First I would like to reiterate my thanks to the staff for the support
on the call and to all the participants.
As I mentioned at the end of the call, we still need to discuss
whether there is a need for any further action from the council at
this point in time. We have had a lot of opportunity to speak with
the implementation team about our questions and have had today's
meeting to discuss in detail any areas where there were possible
variance between the implementation plan and the approved policy. We
have also received extensive information on the thoughts and work that
went into the plan as currently drafted and we received information on
the upcoming process for producing the next version of the plan.
As I understand it, the implementation team is currently hard at work
on comment's analysis and on making revisions to the plan and will be
publishing both an analysis document and the revised plan. I expect
that they will be taking the issues from today's discussions into
account in this process.
Do council member believe there is any reason to produce a document on
the possible variance issues? Or is it enough to wait for the next
version of the plan to check and see how all of these issues have been
handled and responded to?
If there is significant sentiment for further action at this time, I
hope there will also be some volunteers to do the drafting.
thanks
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|