<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Community Travel support Procedure for Mexico City
- To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, Doug Brent <doug.brent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Community Travel support Procedure for Mexico City
- From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:14:15 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: Denise Michel <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=MbW2AK18dIQVWHPQRPohNO/8Eopl50AfkQ7YUpMYJ+SE02GutC86yi4vPTqYlk/Ls5w+scOPfoNx/FkxdLSG4uDhpGNEaKBHgfQC2n2YEFfa4kyJqMZ4CjnoH2eBLbUsqw9sZm9Cm8R9MK6UEGAFAEHOgOtyWPhPYDMqwy15t2o=;
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <251baf130901090448q3c2315edxba73048a2ab2c125@mail.gmail.com> <C58F800D.7BDEA%doug.brent@icann.org> <346E818ACF55407885753B2CF802C716@PSEVO>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Doug,
I agree with Philip - by far the easiest way to untie this Gordian knot
is simply to fund travel for all GNSO councilors.
Greg
________________________________
From: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
To: Doug Brent <doug.brent@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Denise Michel <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>; GNSO Council
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 4:31:58 AM
Subject: [council] Community Travel support Procedure for Mexico City
Doug,
thank you for explaining the current thinking re community travel support.
I am not going to take issue with questions of US fiduciary responsibility
though do note we
are talking about less than 0.3% of ICANN's budget.
Tax authorities would have to be grossly overstaffed to bother about this.
If however you at present can only operate a system of pre-approvals then the
solution is
clear.
Increase the budget to allow for the funding of all GNSO Councilors on a
pre-approval basis.
(This will still not exceed 0.6% of the total ICANN budget).
That will end the divisive and impossible position that the present
arrangements have forced
upon Council.
The tiny amount required is surely within your 2009 contingency so could be
implemented
immediately.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|