[council] RAA motions - resend

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

thee are supposed to be two motions.  In my last ruhed email I  
repeated the one that is n the wiki.
The two motions tabled last meeting until this one are:

> Whereas:
> - ICANN has undertaken a lengthy consultative process related to  
> amending the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA);
> - The parties have arrived at a set of amendments that are generally  
> thought to be worthy of inclusion in the RAA;
> Resolve:
> The GNSO Council supports the attached RAA amendments and recommends  
> to the Board that they be adopted.
> Second motion:
>
> Whereas:
> - The GNSO Council has recommended that the RAA amendments developed  
> by the ICANN community be adopted;
> - There is a belief that additional amendments to the RAA may be  
> required;
> - The Registrar Constituency is open to continuing the dialogue  
> about future changes to the RAA;
> Resolve:
> The GNSO Council calls on ICANN to establish a consultative process  
> by which to review the superset of community-suggested RAA issues  
> and amendments not addressed in the present set of amendments and to  
> work with Registrars to develop a procedure for proposing additional  
> amendments in the future.