[council] Volunteers needed for drafting team on Registration Abuse Policies

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

There are 3 volunteers so far for the drafting team approved in the following 
resolution that the Council passed at its 18 December 2008 meeting. (see 
resolution below)

Mike Rodenbaugh - CBUC
Greg Aaron - Registry c.
James Bladel - Registrar c.

You are invited to send names and email addresses to the GNSO Secretariat 
<GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> by NLT COB Tuesday 6 January 2009, so that 
the group can schedule a meeting.

The mailing list address is:
gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx

and the public archives are at
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-rap-dt/

Thank you for your urgent attention.
Kind regards,

Glen


Resolution on the GNSO Issues Report on Registration Abuse Policies

Whereas:

The GNSO Issues Report on Registration Abuse Policies indicated that further 
review, evaluation and study be done before a PDP is initiated,

Resolved:

That a drafting team be formed to create a proposed charter for a working group 
to investigate the open issues documented in the issues report on Registrations 
Abuse Policy. Specifically:

9.1 Review and Evaluate Findings
A first step would be for the GNSO Council to review and evaluate the findings, 
taking into account that this report provides an overview of registration abuse 
provisions, but does not analyse how these provisions are implemented in 
practice and whether they are deemed effective in addressing registration abuse.
9.2 Identify specific policy issues
Following the review and evaluation of the findings, the GNSO Council would 
need to determine whether there are specific policy issues regarding 
registration abuse. As part of this determination it would be helpful to define 
the specific type(s) of abuse of concern, especially distinguishing between 
registration abuse and other types of abuse if relevant.
9.3 Need for further research
As part of the previous two steps, ICANN Staff would recommend that the GNSO 
Council determines where further research may be needed - e.g. is lack of 
uniformity a substantial problem, how effective are current registration abuse 
provisions in addressing abuse in practice, is an initial review or analysis of 
the UDRP required?

The WG charter should be ready for review by the council on or before 15 
January 2009 and will be voted on at the council meeting of 29 January 2009 at 
which time the councl will take the by-laws required PDP vote.

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org