<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] List etiquette
- To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] List etiquette
- From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:41:35 +1100
- Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
- In-reply-to: <7C07303311014A77B0C1647942166231@PSEVO>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <7C07303311014A77B0C1647942166231@PSEVO>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclkTSw6uoHu0VdlQwik3NGjDVBO7AAST9gjAAHW8KACqag/4AAA4wlQAAEBmRA=
- Thread-topic: [council] List etiquette
Thanks Philip.
Good job.
(couldn't resist!)
Adrian Kinderis
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2009 2:15 AM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: [council] List etiquette
A Happy New Year to all.
May I make the following request to help improve efficiency? I do this as
someone returning from leave and reading (and deleting) many, many e-mails.
1. Please think twice before choosing a reply to sender and a reply to all. To
whom are you really communicating?
2. On a list such as this, never reply to all but reply to the list (to avoid
duplication).
3. If you want to be polite and thank someone for doing something, then thank
them by a reply to sender (but don't copy the whole list). We all know Council
members are lovely polite people - we don't need reminding.
Stick to these simple rules and our e-mail traffic will reduce by around half
as we no longer waste time deleting duplicates and "thank you" e-mails. It
will also do wonders for RSI injuries.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|