ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] New gTLD Motion 3 Edits?

  • To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] New gTLD Motion 3 Edits?
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:11:55 -0500
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Aclqsnsp867SzvQAQjWYv5jIXKbbdg==
  • Thread-topic: New gTLD Motion 3 Edits?

The following motion was tabled in our 18 Dec 08 Council meeting to
allow for some wording edits that a couple people volunteered to submit.
This is just a reminder for those who were planning to suggest edits.
 
Chuck
 

Motion 3 (tabled until 8 January meeting)


Made by: Chuck Gomes 
Seconded: Adrain Kinderis

Whereas both the GNSO and ccNSO are anticipating implementation of
processes to introduce IDN TLDs in 2009,

Resolve

        1) the GNSO Council strongly believes that neither the New gTLD
or
        ccTLD fast track process should result in IDN TLDs in the root
before
        the other unless both the GNSO and ccNSO so agree, and
        2) fast track IDN ccTLDs should not be entered into the root if
they do
        not have an enforceable commitment to do the following as gTLDs
must
        do: 

                i) follow minimal security and stability requirements,
IDN Guidelines and IDN standards;
                ii) pay ICANN fees sufficient to ensure that IDN ccTLDs
are fully self-funding and are not cross-subsidized by other ICANN
activities.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>