<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Volunteers needed for drafting team on Registrations Abuse Policy
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Volunteers needed for drafting team on Registrations Abuse Policy
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:48:20 -0800
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclhUV/TFPCQDW9tS3aa9UJnS/g2gwAD1yhQ
- Thread-topic: Volunteers needed for drafting team on Registrations Abuse Policy
Dear All,
Volunteers are needed for the drafting team approved in the following
resolution that the Council passed at its 18 December 2008 meeting.
You are invited to send names and email addresses to the GNSO Secretariat
<GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> as soon as possible and a meeting will be
scheduled early in January 2009.
Resolution on the GNSO Issues Report on Registration Abuse Policies
Whereas:
The GNSO Issues Report on Registration Abuse Policies indicated that further
review, evaluation and study be done before a PDP is initiated,
Resolved:
That a drafting team be formed to create a proposed charter for a working group
to investigate the open issues documented in the issues report on Registrations
Abuse Policy. Specifically:
9.1 Review and Evaluate Findings
A first step would be for the GNSO Council to review and evaluate the findings,
taking into account that this report provides an overview of registration abuse
provisions, but does not analyse how these provisions are implemented in
practice
and whether they are deemed effective in addressing registration abuse.
9.2 Identify specific policy issues
Following the review and evaluation of the findings, the GNSO Council would
need to determine whether there are specific policy issues regarding
registration abuse. As part of this determination it would be helpful to define
the specific type(s) of abuse of concern, especially distinguishing between
registration abuse and other types of abuse if relevant.
9.3 Need for further research
As part of the previous two steps, ICANN Staff would recommend that the GNSO
Council determines where further research may be needed - e.g. is lack of
uniformity a substantial problem, how effective are current registration abuse
provisions in addressing abuse in practice, is an initial review or analysis of
the UDRP required?
The WG charter should be ready for review by the council on or before 15
January 2009 and will be voted on at the council meeting of 29 January 2009 at
which time the councl will take the by-laws required PDP vote.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|