ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] RE: Voting on RAA Amendments Motion(s)

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] RE: Voting on RAA Amendments Motion(s)
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:52:05 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <BC4C3DFA6759492E9C6C21ADA38E1CDB@HPLAPTOP>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <BC4C3DFA6759492E9C6C21ADA38E1CDB@HPLAPTOP>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Hi,

In looking at this, I think we may have least options - especially since we have a motion on the floor.

If the motion is voted down and the board support the GNSO's position, then the after effect could be somewhat as you describe, possible requiring a PDP process. This would need to be discussed with the Legal Counsel.

Alternatively, an amendment to the current motion could be proposed to separate the vote on the proposed changes. We have precedence for considering such amendments though I don't know of one that has succeeded. If such an amendment were proposed and it succeed then we would need to vote on each of the 4 areas separately (or the 15 separate changes depending on the motion and its success).

I am not advocating ether of these measures, but offering them as possibilities that the council might wish to consider.

a.

On 12 Dec 2008, at 18:33, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

Hi,

The Council has barely discussed the RAA amendments proposed by Staff and the Registrars, yet we are asked to essentially approve them wholesale? Why are we asked to do that, and why would we do that? In that scenario, one constituency gets everything it wants done with the RAA, and nobody else has a say.

Might it be a better approach to form a group to determine which of the RAA amendments have full consensus as written, which could have full consensus if reworded, and which should be abandoned for now? The group could then suggest rewording of some amendments, and also lay out a plan for sequenced requests for Issues Reports from Staff, and/or Working Groups, to address any and all identified open issues. Meanwhile the Board would understand which of the amendments have full consensus and could approve those, and the other Constituencies will have greater comfort that their issues with the RAA will be addressed.

Thanks,
Mike

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:27 AM
To: Rosette, Kristina; council@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] RE: Voting on RAA Amendments Motion(s)

Yes, weighted voting would apply.  Thanks, Liz

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:21 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Voting on RAA Amendments Motion(s)

Hi,

During our wrap-up session in Cairo, I'd asked if weighted voting would apply to votes on motions relating to the RAA Amendments. I don't believe I've received an answer yet. Could the appropriate staff person please let me know?

Many thanks.

K





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>