<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:56:21 -0500
- In-reply-to: <8BD4A279E8F2487CB605E9C54D8924D9@PSEVO>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8BD4A279E8F2487CB605E9C54D8924D9@PSEVO>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclZirX8SxVrfeaaRbGrpTFk/mTHdAAARjXQABoqKSAABpXAUAA1UhjAAACZY+AAAGxnAA==
- Thread-topic: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
Thanks Philip and all BC members.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:46 AM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working
model"
Please find attached BC comments on the proposed grouping of
WHOIS studies.
We hope what can become essentially a friendly amendment.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|